The short answer to your question is, no it is not "as designed". The
references should have been updated correctly. Vault 4.0 does have some
issues with .idw's and updating references. However, I *thought* what you
are attempting did work. Maybe someone else can comment on whether it works
for them or not.
wrote in message news:5111961@discussion.autodesk.com...
Here I go again having a discussion with myself. I tried copy design on
A.ipt copying A.idw. Renamed files to the default, A(2).ipt and A(2).idw.
Results look good in VE, A(2).idw uses A(2).ipt. BUT when I open A(2).idw
with inventor it is looking for A.ipt. Is this a bug. Is this not the
intended use? Does anyone else have this problem?
Screen shot shows VE reporting that 02-2899-E-100B(3).idw uses
02-2899-E-100B Finger Back Guide 1 inch Steel & magna (3).ipt and Inventor
opened
from vault 02-2899-E-100B (3).idw and resolved 02-2899-E-100B FINGER back
guide 1 inch steel & MAGNA.ipt. which is the original ipt not the new one!
Is it "as designed" to have to force the resolve link box to appear by
deleting or moving the old file and then pick the new file?