Community
Fusion Design, Validate & Document
Stuck on a workflow? Have a tricky question about a Fusion (formerly Fusion 360) feature? Share your project, tips and tricks, ask questions, and get advice from the community.
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

TS Brep patch loft artifacts and problems

5 REPLIES 5
Reply
Message 1 of 6
cekuhnen
410 Views, 5 Replies

TS Brep patch loft artifacts and problems

the loft command here either fails or produces unusable geometry while

the brep and ts geometry is pretty clean

 

i know I loft trimmed edges a real no go in Alias so not sure if that drives the terrible surface generation.

 

 

Claas Kuhnen

Faculty Industrial Design – Wayne State Universit

Chair Interior Design – Wayne State University

Owner studioKuhnen – product : interface : design

5 REPLIES 5
Message 2 of 6
innovatenate
in reply to: cekuhnen

I sketched some rails for the Patch Loft surface body and I think the results are a little closer to what you're looking for. It  seems to help with the bulging or the twisting when you have tangent or smooth continuity selected for the profiles. Take a look at the attached file and let me know if that helps. 

 

Smooth with Rails.PNG

 

Thanks,

 

 




Nathan Chandler
Principal Specialist
Message 3 of 6
cekuhnen
in reply to: innovatenate

mh the loft had still bad results but it fixed the twist problem

 

 

loft surface continuity seems to be not working well.

I guess it is the mix of loft continuity and rail constraints.

 

I add the rails and stil there are visible transitional problems with smooth (loft)

 

the rails of course 

Screen Shot 2014-11-14 at 8.17.43 PM.png

Screen Shot 2014-11-14 at 8.27.13 PM.png

Screen Shot 2014-11-14 at 8.21.23 PM.png

 

Here all rails are smooth constraint - the loft is set to smooth so it should all be smooth and flawless but is not

Screen Shot 2014-11-14 at 8.36.24 PM.png

 

 

the result got much better for sure. still I think behind what I could get in smoothness in Alias

Claas Kuhnen

Faculty Industrial Design – Wayne State Universit

Chair Interior Design – Wayne State University

Owner studioKuhnen – product : interface : design

Message 4 of 6
cekuhnen
in reply to: innovatenate

here one result with Smooth for Loft and tangent for curves and the result is bad

Screen Shot 2014-11-14 at 8.16.22 PM.png

 

then when I tried to adjust the handles like scaling the tangent constraing value

this happened rendering the 3d sketch and constraint system again into a complex and painful experience

Screen Shot 2014-11-14 at 8.25.01 PM.png

 

I start to think that while the constraints are cool Fusion really needs a serious blend curve too with better weighting options like any other CAD surfacing tool has.

I spend more time here on all this construction than I would ever do in Alias.

Claas Kuhnen

Faculty Industrial Design – Wayne State Universit

Chair Interior Design – Wayne State University

Owner studioKuhnen – product : interface : design

Message 5 of 6
deyop
in reply to: cekuhnen

I may have missed something in this thread or confused it with another.  Why not create this as a single T-Spline?  This is the value of T-Splines to reduce the problem with managing NURBS transitions.  

 

Alias is a capable surface modeling package but it would suffer from this approach as well if it could handle it at all.  The double curvature inflection on the one side is a real challenge.  This feels like asking for trouble. Smiley Happy  The tangency is obviously failing you as indicated in the image but driving the transition with curves in this area could be a problem for any strategy.

managinetransition.png

Blend curves have a nice interaction.  I know coming from an Alias background the Blend curves feel integrated in applying constraints during construction where in Fusion we create the sketch entity and then apply the constraint.  We can learn from that.

 

 

 

 

 

Message 6 of 6
cekuhnen
in reply to: deyop

Hi Paul,

First the student should learn the art of NURBS first before they even touch TS because they would refuse anything else. Sad but true. Also TS requires careful placement of CVs. What is easy for us stresses them. So this is the educational goal. Changes are much higher after they graduate they will have to deal with NURBS than TS.

The second problem with TS is the quality of the surface it creates compared to Alias or other NURBS modelers. TS runs fine in Fusion but exported as STEP is pretty heavy and not suitable to be CV manipulated.


But besides all this and I personally would use TS of course, the loft tool still needs refinement or the workflow because in my last posts you can see that the results are not ideal.

Claas Kuhnen

Faculty Industrial Design – Wayne State Universit

Chair Interior Design – Wayne State University

Owner studioKuhnen – product : interface : design

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.

Post to forums  

Autodesk Design & Make Report