Community
Fusion Design, Validate & Document
Stuck on a workflow? Have a tricky question about a Fusion (formerly Fusion 360) feature? Share your project, tips and tricks, ask questions, and get advice from the community.
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Change parameter length raising to power of 2

6 REPLIES 6
Reply
Message 1 of 7
davoque
575 Views, 6 Replies

Change parameter length raising to power of 2

In the change parameter dialog, it won't let you raise a length parameter to the power of 2.

 

I need to do this to work out a diagonal using pythagoras rule.

 

I want to put in SQRT(2 * (x ^ 2))

 

2014-11-25_22-20-59.jpg

I can get around it by using no unit style parameters, but it adds more parameters, clutter and complexity.

6 REPLIES 6
Message 2 of 7
joel.palioca
in reply to: davoque

Hello,

 

We are currently diving into this a little more to understand what is going on and will work to come up with a better solution in the future for you.  As you have found out, if you leverage a unitless parameter it allows you to work around the issue you are seeing.  While not practicle at the moment, this may be the current solution why we track down additional ways to approach it.


Cheers,



[Joel Palioca]
[Software QA Engineer]
Joel(dot)Palioca(at)autodesk(dot)com
Autodesk, Inc.

Message 3 of 7
prainsberry
in reply to: joel.palioca

I was playing with it a bit and seems that it is a units problem.   The problem being that it sees the result as mm*mm.  

 

You can do this to solve the issue: 

x ^ 2 / ( 1 mm )

or: 

pow(x; 2) / 1 mm

 



Patrick Rainsberry
Developer Advocate, Fusion 360
Message 4 of 7
davoque
in reply to: prainsberry

Thanks, that's a good work around. Smiley Happy

 

Unfortunately, it fails at the next hurdle when pythagoras comes to the table:

 

2014-11-26_6-41-46.jpg

Message 5 of 7
prainsberry
in reply to: davoque

Looks like you need to go the other way for SQRT()

 

( sqrt(( spacing / 1 mm ) ^ 2) ) * 1 mm

 

Kind of a crazy workaround but looks like it works

 



Patrick Rainsberry
Developer Advocate, Fusion 360
Message 6 of 7
davoque
in reply to: prainsberry

You're smart, thanks for working that out. I tired all sorts of combinations.

 

I like the idea to eliminate the units at the start then follow through from there.

 

And yes, "kind of crazy" Smiley Happy

 

This still needs to be fixed as it is confusing and distracting.

Message 7 of 7
joel.palioca
in reply to: davoque

Glad a good workaround was found.  After you brought up this topic myself another QA have been working to better understand how things are being handled in the parameters table and what is still missing.  We are still working on putting together some items that should be fixed/implemented, but once we do it will allow us to start working on getting some improvements into the product :).


Cheers,



[Joel Palioca]
[Software QA Engineer]
Joel(dot)Palioca(at)autodesk(dot)com
Autodesk, Inc.

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.

Post to forums  

Autodesk Design & Make Report