CRIMS data

[kameshg]

How is warpage calculation done for 3D mesh, it doesnt use the CRIMS data, but it does give pretty good results( especially for LCP parts)? Can anyone expalin this?

thanks

kamesh

[inba.oneway777]

Hi Kamesh,

With DD (and midplane) analyses, it is good practice to verify the material being used has been tested for Correlated Residual In-Mold Stress (CRIMS). CRIMS adjusts for the gap between material properties captured when tested in the lab environment and those actually experienced in actual molding conditions. The 3D analysis uses a combination of thermal expansion data and volumetric shrinkage to compensate for this gap, resulting in it being a better tool to use if there is no CRIMS data present.

Regards,

Inba

[sabarinathan1021]

Hello Kamesh,

1. Thick & Chunky parts  has to be considered for 3D injection molding simulation for a better warpage calculation with CRIMS data.

2. 3D simulation can take into account more than just planar flow, jetting, air pockets or voids in the melt, It also allows for modeling parts with non-uniform wall thicknesses.

3. You can see Volumetric Shrinkage, internal temperature behaviour after cooling in thicker regions only with the 3D mesh analysis, which we cannot see in DD or Midplane mesh.

4. These important factors which will directly impact the the warpage results & 3D analysis will consider all these factors for its warpage calculations.

Thank you

Regards

Sabarinathan. S

[madhukeshwart · Accepted solution]

CRIMS was used for  Dual Domain and Midplane mesh options.

=====================================================

CRIMS (Corrected Residual In Mold Stress) provides a unique method that combines the theoretical model for residual stress and a model for morphology development. This provides a correction of errors due to the use of material data that are obtained under lab conditions rather than those experienced by the material during actual injection molding.

The testing for CRIMS includes trials that are performed on a matrix of 28 molding conditions in order to take into account the material's shrinkage behavior as a result of:

• Part thickness
• Melt temperature
• Mold temperature
• Injection time and profile
• Packing time and profile
• Cooling time

3D was excluded due to the use of PVT date, volumetric shrinkage and CTE,  rather than residual stress.

====================================================================================

Shrinkage prediction method for 3D models (Concept)

For injection molded parts, the part is constrained in the mold. During the solidification of an injection molded part, shrinkage of the solidified layer is prevented by two mechanisms. Once the part is ejected from the mold, these residual stresses will be released in the form of shrinkage deformation

There are two mechanisms preventing shrinkage of the solidified layer while still in the mold. Firstly, adhesion to the mold walls restrain (at least the outer skin of) the solid layers from moving, and secondly, the newly formed solid surface will be kept fixed by the stretching forces of melt pressure.

In-cavity residual stresses build up during solidification. Due to the nature of constrained quenching, the residual stresses distribution is largely determined by the varying pressure history, coupled with the frozen layer growth. Once the part is ejected from the mold, these residual stresses will be released in the form of shrinkage deformation. If the initial strains, which are equivalent to the in-cavity residual stresses, are uniform, the part will shrink uniformly without any warpage and post-mold residual stresses. Warpage is caused by variations in shrinkage throughout the part.

Two types of shrinkage variations are considered:

Shrinkage variations from region to region (differential shrinkage effects)

For typical thin-walled parts, this form of shrinkage variation can be divided into variations in the thickness direction of molded parts, mainly caused by the differential cooling and variations from surface region to surface region.

Shrinkage variation in different directions (orientation effect)

The difference between parallel and perpendicular shrinkage, and anisotropic material properties relating to the fiber-orientation distribution are one of the main causes of part warpage for fiber-filled thermoplastics.

The shrinkage of injection molded parts depends on the thermodynamic behavior of the material during processing. For simplicity, we assume linear elastic behavior in the solidified part and purely viscous behavior in the melt.

It is reasonable to approximate the linear shrinkage using the formulation:

where

• is the linear thermal expansion coefficient (CTE) at temperature T in the i-th principal direction.
• T₀ is the temperature when the local cavity pressure reached the atmospheric condition. This value is obtained from the flow simulation.
• T_r is the room temperature.

The 4-node first-order tetrahedral element is appropriate for 3D flow simulation. However, if the first-order tetrahedral element is used for the Warp analysis of typical thin-walled parts or thin-walled areas of complex three-dimensional parts, the notorious shear locking problem will make the structural response very stiff [1]. Shear locking, or parasitic shear, is caused by an inaccuracy in the linear displacement field of a linear tetrahedral element. It can be exacerbated by elements with large aspect ratios. On the other hand, the high aspect ratio tetrahedral elements may not be avoidable if the computational cost is to be kept low. Therefore, the first-order tetrahedral element is not suitable for the thin-walled areas of injection molded parts.

A hybrid element scheme has been designed for the 3D Warp analysis. 4-node first-order tetrahedral elements are used in the 3D solid areas, and 10-node second-order tetrahedral elements are used in the thin-walled areas. Transitional 5-9 node tetrahedral elements are used in the transitional areas which connect the thin-walled and thick areas.

For fiber-filled polymers, the flow-induced fiber orientation is also simulated. Then the moduli, Poisson's ratios and thermal expansion coefficients of the composite material can be determined using the calculated fiber orientation and mechanical properties of polymer matrix and the fiber [2, 3, 4]. This information is put into structural tetrahedral elements, in which the 3D orthotropic stress-strain relationship is used.

3D warpage simulation normally requires significant computational time particularly if the number of elements is very large and if there is a big thin-walled region. An efficient preconditioned conjugate gradient iterative solver is implemented for reducing the memory requirement and computational time.

Reference :  Shrinkage prediction method for 3D models

[sabarinathan1021]

Hello Madhu,

Thank you for the addditional info..its a useful litreture.

[aniq.uppal]

Kamesh,

CRIMS is used for DD and Mid Plane models, 3D Warp analysis uses Mechanical properties of the material.

Aniq