Here is the best procedure for differentiating mesh densities on the inner and outer surfaces, which works well with a Mold Wizard - generated, simple mold block:
The part, feed system and cooling channels should all be meshed before you mesh the mold.
Now, with complete mold assembiels imported from SAT files, selecting all outside surfaces may not be that easy / obvious. Therefore, I'm trying to use another procedure:
- generate mesh for the mold while stopping after surface mesh is ready (allows me to set a coarse mesh for outer surfaces)
- generate mesh again to create tetras: this time, I'm presented with a couple of parameters, one of them being "Mesh size gradation ratio from internal to external surfaces ". The Help system suggests its value to be of 1.5, but this doesn't work well for me...
Question: which of the above 2 approaches is better suited for 3D molds, imported into AMI for 3D (FEM) analysis purposes?
BTW, the Help system's "show me" video shows yet another method, whereby the mold mesh is generated in a single sstep withpout differentiating its inside/ouside densities; while the most straight-forward, this method tends to produce enormous number of tetras: for a 4-cavity mold with some 1.5 million tetras (in parts + cooling system + runner system), over 10 million mold tetras can be generated this way!
OK - after some more experiments, I find that setting the Mesh size gradation ratio from internal to external surfaces parameter to 2 works well, with the inner / outer min. edge length equal to global edge / 2x global edge length, respectively.
This gives fine mesh on the cavity interface, while keeping an acceptably low number of mold tetras.
Piotr
I still have some doubts about the optimum mesh edge sizes for internal vs. external surfaces of the mold, imported from a CAD system...
Yannick Moret in his presentation on 2012 new features says:
- and I'd agree that 3 would be nice, and result in a much more manageable number of mold tetras. However, the size gradation ratio from internal to external surfaces parameter in the Mold (3D) mesher only allows values up to 2.
Why such discrepancy, Yannick?
Thanks,
Piotr