I have a model that was run using TPU CF40-01. The part has a wall thickness that tapers from 5mm to 1mm. Dual DomainConfidence of fill, the flow front freezes before filling, which is expected. The 3D states that it will fill but may have an unacceptable part. Why is there a variation in the results between Dual Domain and 3D? Which of the two is the more accurate to reality? If 3D is more accurate representation of fill then how can we get the fiber orientation in the flowage area to match in Dual Domain?
I made the same Experiences... Dual Domain is the more accurate simulation, within the orientation of the plastic. This not possible to get in 3D.