Simulation Mechanical Forums (Read-Only)
Welcome to Autodesk’s Simulation Mechanical Forums. Share your knowledge, ask questions, and explore popular Simulation Mechanical topics.
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Phantom Displacement Constraints

15 REPLIES 15
SOLVED
Reply
Message 1 of 16
nosborne
745 Views, 15 Replies

Phantom Displacement Constraints

I have a beam/plate model that has numerous parts suppressed and other parts merged into it from Inventor .ipt files. I ran the analysis and the results appeared to have some extra displacement constraints. I exported the model as an Ansys .cdb file and displacement constraints are on the locations that I applied them to but also at four other nodes. I tried to inquire reaction results on those nodes but the node number does not exist in the model. Is there a way to rebuild the database/model or what other options do I have ??? The attached image shows that constraints are resulting in the tube bending upwards when it should be bending downwards.

15 REPLIES 15
Message 2 of 16
S.LI
in reply to: nosborne

Could I ask several questions about your model?

1.) what's the ASIM version?

2.) what's the analysis type, LSS, MES or others?

3.) Is the reaction output enabled for this model, such as reaction force, moment?

4.) Is this displacement constraint or prescribed displacement?

5.) Can you see these extract constraints in Results tab (kinds of arrows)?

 

Thanks.

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If this response answers your concern, please mark it as "solved".
Message 3 of 16
nosborne
in reply to: nosborne

1. Autodesk Simulation Mechanical 2012 Buikd 2012.01.00.0017.

2. Analysis type is LSS.

3. The reaction output is enabled in the output file.

4. This is displacement constraints of zero at the four nodes (all translations and rotations).

5. The extra constraints are not visible in either the FEA Editor or the Results environment but they are making the results useless to me.

 

I hope this helps. The database is quite large or I would send it to you. I will see how small I can get it.

 

 

 

 

Message 4 of 16
S.LI
in reply to: nosborne

Could these points be k-nodes for beam elements?

In order to define beam orientations, ASIM automatically generates several k-nodes, and they are fully constrained.

You may find more about k-node in ASIM WIKI or help.

 

In both FEA Editor and the file you exported, you should see coordinates for these nodes.

Do they match with each other?

 

Please make sure coordinates of k-nodes are large enough compared with your model size.

 

 

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If this response answers your concern, please mark it as "solved".
Message 5 of 16
S.LI
in reply to: S.LI

BTW:

Could other reasons lead to the wrong results?

Or you are pretty sure it's because of extract constraints.

 

Thanks.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If this response answers your concern, please mark it as "solved".
Message 6 of 16
nosborne
in reply to: nosborne

I exported the model as an Ansys file and then opened it with Simulation again. I lost some of the beam x-sections and end releases in the process but the model solves correctly now. What export format would I lose the least data in? If you would like me to send my database to you I could do that - it's 45MB.

Message 7 of 16
S.LI
in reply to: nosborne

I'm not sure how importing and exporting work.

What do you mean " the model solves correctly now"? Do you get results you expect?

 

Maybe the mistakes in model DB already got fixed during exporting, importing, resetting etc.

 

 

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If this response answers your concern, please mark it as "solved".
Message 8 of 16
nosborne
in reply to: nosborne

The database seems to still be corrupt but by exporting it and importing it to a new model it gets around the problem. I am just about to solve the rebuilt model now with all the correct loads and constraints so I will check it out once more. I plan on submitting the problem model to Autodesk to see what they can find. I will keep you posted (pun intended).

Message 9 of 16
S.LI
in reply to: nosborne

Thanks and good luck.

 

BTW, do you get a chance to see if the extra constraints in your export file are the k-nodes or not? I'm pretty curious on this.

 

Best,

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If this response answers your concern, please mark it as "solved".
Message 10 of 16
nosborne
in reply to: nosborne

How do I check that out easily in Simulation? Can I get the coordinates of the k-nodes easily? Are the k-nodes usually constrained in all DOF's?

Message 11 of 16
S.LI
in reply to: nosborne

K-nodes are fully constrained.

To check them, select a beam element, right-click and pick up "Beam Orientations", you should see the following picture.

"Use Default" means code generates them at far away places. Otherwise, you should see the coordinates there.

 

 

Untitled.png

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If this response answers your concern, please mark it as "solved".
Message 12 of 16
sunj.autodesk
in reply to: nosborne

Another way to try:

 

Can you temporarily disable/surpress the other parts and only keep the problematic part? Try add some loads and boundary conditions on it and see whether the phantom displacment constraint still exist?

Message 13 of 16
John_Holtz
in reply to: sunj.autodesk

Hi,

 

Actually, I am not sure that you clearly indicated where these "phantom constraints" appear in your model. From looking at your original screenshot, most of us probably assumed the item you were talking about is the circle just underneath the arrow at the top of the image. That's what I assumed.

 

By enlarging the image, I noticed that the circle is orange, not red. Orange circles are beam end releases. I assume that the location coincides with the location where you applied end releases in the FEA Editor. Note that the symbol appears part way between the two nodes on the beam.

 



John Holtz, P.E.

Global Product Support
Autodesk, Inc.


If not provided already, be sure to indicate the version of Inventor Nastran you are using!

"The knowledge you seek is at knowledge.autodesk.com" - Confucius 😉
Message 14 of 16
nosborne
in reply to: John_Holtz

Sorry to throw you off with the beam end release. I don't know where the phantom constraints are as they do not show up in the model anywhere. I spoke to Pat Tessaro this morning - he has the model and is checking through the database to determine what is really happening. I will be sure and let all know what he finds out. Thanks for all your input.

Message 15 of 16
nosborne
in reply to: nosborne

The model had some very poorly shaped elements that were created due to the presence of construction points. The poorly shaped elements resulted in a large variance of stiffness and an ill-conditioned matrix. The only clue was a warning message that the stiffness ratio exceeded a predetermined warning value.

Message 16 of 16
S.LI
in reply to: nosborne

Thanks for your update.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If this response answers your concern, please mark it as "solved".

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.

Post to forums  

Autodesk Design & Make Report