Simulation Mechanical Forums (Read-Only)
Welcome to Autodesk’s Simulation Mechanical Forums. Share your knowledge, ask questions, and explore popular Simulation Mechanical topics.
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

FEA Results follow up

1 REPLY 1
Reply
Message 1 of 2
CPEProjE
356 Views, 1 Reply

FEA Results follow up

Forum,

 

Please take a look at the following file; it is a 1/4-section of a skid assembly with x- and z-symmetry applied.  I loaded that section with 162500 lbs (6.07 psi see 2nd screen shot for location of water weight/force).

 

My question is, if the total weight over the entire skid area shown is 650,000 lbs, should I have entered that value in the -Y instead of the 165000 lbs?  Does Simulation treat that number as the whole or strictly as the weight/force applied to that quarter section?

 

Secondly, I chose brick elements for both the plate and beams (solid) with mesh settings at 15%.  Are my results skewed with incorrect element type?  After initial mesh, should I have changed the actual W12x96, W8x31 and L3x3x3/8 to beam then made the associative selections in element definitions?

 

I ran the test in 2 ways:

  1. 650,000 lb load in the quarter section; displacement results were 0.0395 w/ Von Mises of 24,668.24 psi
  2. 162,500 lb load in the quarter section; displacement results were 0.011 w/ Von Mises of 6,398 psi

 

 

Regards and thank you for looking.

 

skid floor displacement.png

 

skid floor loading1.jpg

 

skid floor loading2.jpg

1 REPLY 1
Message 2 of 2
Stefan2653
in reply to: CPEProjE

Hi,

You should be good with the 1/4 load on 1/4 of the model.

 

The accuracy of the results depends on how the thickness of the "thin" sections are meshed. At a minimum you should have at least two elements thick in the "thin" sections. Displacements can be reasonably accurate with a lower mesh density, but the stresses could be significantly off if you are only one element thick.

 

The best approach to a satisfactoty mesh would be to perform a convergence study. Plot the peak stresses with your 15% mesh density, then with several tighter mesh densities (e.g. 10%, 7%). When the stress values vary by a few percentage points between mesh density runs (or by a value you deem acceptable based on your overall stress margins), your results should be acceptably accurate.

 

You could also mesh the assembly as plate elements and connect your I-beams to the floor with stiff beam elements.

 

Stefan

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.

Post to forums  

Autodesk Design & Make Report