Simulation Mechanical Forums (Read-Only)
Welcome to Autodesk’s Simulation Mechanical Forums. Share your knowledge, ask questions, and explore popular Simulation Mechanical topics.
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Different simulation results by using different meshing selection?

2 REPLIES 2
SOLVED
Reply
Message 1 of 3
Anonymous
742 Views, 2 Replies

Different simulation results by using different meshing selection?

I build a simple 3D cantilever beam model (Long: 200mm, Width:40mm, Thick:2mm) by CAD software, then import into Algor. The beam is fixed at one end. Uniform surface pressure( 0.025N/mm^2 ) is set to load on top surface. Strangely, the simulation result is quiet different among using brick, mid-plane and plate meshing selection.

(Case1)Brick element: The maximum displacement of simulation results is 36.65mm.

(Case2)mid-plan mesh(plate element):Plate thickness 2mm is auto-detected by Algor. The maximum displacement of simulation results is 13.02mm.

(Case3)plate mesh directly(plate element):Plate thickness 2mm is set by modify the Element Definition. The maximum displacement of simulation results is 4.66mm.

What might cause the different results? Thanks.

                                                     Ccz90

2 REPLIES 2
Message 2 of 3
John_Holtz
in reply to: Anonymous

ccz90,

 

Case 1 and 2 should give the same answer. Please check that the material properties and load are the same in both models, etc.

 

If I understand your description, case 3 is a misuse of the plate option. Please see the figures in this section of the documentation ("Help > Contents"): "Autodesk Algor Simulation > Meshing Overview > Mesh Overview > Meshing CAD Solid Models > Model Mesh Settings". Then expand the paragraph "Mesh type section" to see the differences between the brick, midplane, and plate mesh.

 

By the way, what is the correct answer? It should be a simple hand calculation.

 



John Holtz, P.E.

Global Product Support
Autodesk, Inc.


If not provided already, be sure to indicate the version of Inventor Nastran you are using!

"The knowledge you seek is at knowledge.autodesk.com" - Confucius 😉
Message 3 of 3
S.LI
in reply to: Anonymous

If the material is assumed as steel with E=210e9 Pa, my answer is 35.7mm, which is close to the one in Case 1.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If this response answers your concern, please mark it as "solved".

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.

Post to forums  

Autodesk Design & Make Report