## Simulation Mechanical and Multiphysics

- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic to the Top
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page

# Beam "Worst Stress" for Circular Cross-Sections

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Hi all,

I do a lot of beam-based analysis of structures with circular tube cross-sections. As I've been thinking about the definition of "worst stress" for beams, it seems that this may not be totally accurate for a circular or hollow circular cross-sections.

The help documentation indicates that mathematical worst-stress could be at a non-existent location for asymmetrical beams. For a round beam, despite it being symmetrical, it seems that the worst stress reported may not be exactly correct either. It would seem that in-between the '2' and '3' axes on a circular cross-section (say at a 45° angle) that the stress would be somewhere between the values of |P/A| + |M2/S2| and |P/A| + |M3/S3|.

Does this make sense, or am I thinking about this incorrectly?

I'd appreciate any feedback.

Adam

# Re: Beam "Worst Stress" for Circular Cross-Sections

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

I agree with your thinking Adam. The highest stress on the surface of a circle or tube is really lower than |M2/S2| + |M3/S3|.

So, if you want to have some fun today , you can check my math. The stress at a point depends on the distance from the neutral axis, it seems reasonable (but perhaps not correct!) that the

worse stress = stress2*cosine + stress3*sine.

where the angle is measured from one of the axes. The maximum result occurs at the angle where the derivative equals zero, or

change in worse stress/change in angle = -stress2*sine + stress3*cosine = 0

So the angle depends on the values for the maximum stress about axes 2 and 3. If we look at the ratio stress3/stress2 = X, the equation simplifies to

-stress2*sine + (X*stress2)*cosine = 0

stress2*(X*cosine - sine) = 0

Of course, stress2 could be 0, but the more interesting result is when

X*cosine - sine = 0

X*cosine = sine

X = sine/cosine = tangent

So by calculating a few ratios of X, the angle where the maximum is located can be calculated, which can then be used to calculate the maximum worse stress of stress2*(cosine+X*sine). Here are a few examples:

X =

stress3/stress2 Angle worse stress/stress2 software's (|M2/S2| + |M3/S3|)/stress2

0 0 1

0.578 30 1.16

1 45 1.41

1.5 56.3 1.80

2 63.4 2.24

3 71.6

If you do not want to use the conservative values from the software, you might be able to write a custom formula to do the above calculation. That would be neat to see if it works!

Mechanical Engineer

Pittsburgh, PA

16 years experience with Simulation Mechanical

# Re: Beam "Worst Stress" for Circular Cross-Sections

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content