Community
CFD Forum
Welcome to Autodesk’s CFD Forums. Share your knowledge, ask questions, and explore popular CFD topics.
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

wall roughness height

7 REPLIES 7
SOLVED
Reply
Message 1 of 8
marco.mueller
1878 Views, 7 Replies

wall roughness height

Hi,

 

can you clarify which roughness height is used in CFD. Is it the "absolute" value?

 

Is it the "epsilon" value that would be used in the Moody cart?

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moody_chart

 

Thanks

Marco

Dipl.-Ing. (FH) Marco Müller
Application Engineer Digital Simulation
Mensch und Maschine Deutschland GmbH
www.mum.de/cfd

7 REPLIES 7
Message 2 of 8
OmkarJ
in reply to: marco.mueller

Indeed,  it is average absolute roughness of the pipe and has a unit of length.

Message 3 of 8
marco.mueller
in reply to: OmkarJ

any reference??? 😉

Dipl.-Ing. (FH) Marco Müller
Application Engineer Digital Simulation
Mensch und Maschine Deutschland GmbH
www.mum.de/cfd

Message 4 of 8
OmkarJ
in reply to: marco.mueller

Sorry for late response, had been away on a vacation 🙂

Have a look at doco:

 

http://help.autodesk.com/view/SCDSE/2014/ENU/?url=/cloudhelp/2014/ENU/SimCFD/files/GUID-511AF0D1-6FB...

http://help.autodesk.com/view/SCDSE/2014/ENU/?url=/cloudhelp/2014/ENU/SimCFD/files/GUID-61C4EB55-362...

 

The second link states it is the height from wall with unit of lengthl. Hope this helps.

 

Omkar

Message 5 of 8
marco.mueller
in reply to: OmkarJ

well thats all clear but I'm rather trying to correlate the "average rougness height" used in CFD to more common definitions like here:

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surface_roughness

 

or the roughness in the first link I posted.

 

Example: the customer has a pipe with Ra = 3.2. Would entering 0.0032 mm as wall roughness value be correct?

Dipl.-Ing. (FH) Marco Müller
Application Engineer Digital Simulation
Mensch und Maschine Deutschland GmbH
www.mum.de/cfd

Message 6 of 8
OmkarJ
in reply to: marco.mueller

Well, here is the catch! Ra value just represents the texture abnormalities of the surface but the value "r" in the SimCFD documentation (in length unit) is the sandgrain roughness and both are not always comparable. Nikuradse has done extensive experiments to correlate the two:

 

Nikuradse, J. 1933 Laws of flow in rough pipes. VDI Forschungsheft 361. In translation, NACA TM 1292, 1950.

 

You can find additional information here, and more if you decide to do a bit of search:

 

http://ijmem.avestia.com/2012/008.html
http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/365/1852/699.full
http://arrow.dit.ie/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1030&context=engschmecart

 

I am not aware of any formula that will straightaway give the sandgrain roughness from Ra value and there exists a lot of literature around this. From one of the references above, the RzJIS value given in the Wiki link you posted comes closest in approximating the sandgrain roughness and Ra is the worst.

 

Will be interesting if Autodesk personnel have anymore to add on this...

Message 7 of 8
marco.mueller
in reply to: OmkarJ

Thanks for your research, Omkar!

Dipl.-Ing. (FH) Marco Müller
Application Engineer Digital Simulation
Mensch und Maschine Deutschland GmbH
www.mum.de/cfd

Message 8 of 8
eshtiwe266
in reply to: marco.mueller

  • Hello 
  • I have a question, did you figure out how find roughness height from Ra. I have same problem I have Ra=0.55 but I don’t know the relationship or how to find roughness height for sand grain to put it in CFD fluent.
  •  Thank you 

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.

Post to forums  

Autodesk Design & Make Report