Community
CFD Forum
Welcome to Autodesk’s CFD Forums. Share your knowledge, ask questions, and explore popular CFD topics.
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

multi storey buidling model _Wind volume can't be recognised

4 REPLIES 4
SOLVED
Reply
Message 1 of 5
allger
385 Views, 4 Replies

multi storey buidling model _Wind volume can't be recognised

Hello everyone!!

 

I created a model of a buiding but simulation cfd can't recognise the the volume between the model bounds and the building.

I get a message that the 2-d model is not planar but as i ve seen in other examples simulation cfd can recognise surfaces that are not planar.

I haven''t assigned materials or boundary conditions to any surface yet in case i should make some changes to the geometry first. I hope someone can check the modle that I attached.Thanks in advance.

 

 

4 REPLIES 4
Message 2 of 5
allger
in reply to: allger

Ok i should have used a .sat file.

Message 3 of 5
Jon.Wilde
in reply to: allger

It is because CFD works with volumes/solids in 3D. There are only surfaces here and no solid parts. 

Make them solid and this should be fine.

 

Thanks,

Jon

Message 4 of 5
allger
in reply to: Jon.Wilde

Dear John,

 

Thanks again for your reply to this and the other posts as well. I used loft (solid as you said ) and then exported to a sat file and it actually worked. here is  the final model that i would like to know your opininion about.

It is very interesting that i get a substantial force transverse to the wind directrion but is it correct?

Message 5 of 5
Jon.Wilde
in reply to: allger

There are a few things to try to be sure.

 

Refine the mesh and see if it effects the result, we want to be mesh independent. I tend to refine to 0.7 and see if the results change by more than 5%.

Consider enlarging the domain width - right now you are probably artificially accellerating the flow around the sides of the building

Why are you running compressible? I would think this could significantly throw the results, I would stick to incompressible, your flow rates are only 40m/s

 

Hope that helps!

 

Thanks,

Jon

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.

Post to forums  

Autodesk Design & Make Report