Community
CFD Forum
Welcome to Autodesk’s CFD Forums. Share your knowledge, ask questions, and explore popular CFD topics.
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Fully Developed flow - Invalid shape

7 REPLIES 7
SOLVED
Reply
Message 1 of 8
Cnoj
1354 Views, 7 Replies

Fully Developed flow - Invalid shape

Sim CFD 2014:

 

I'm trying to set up a velocity boundary condition with fully developed flow at the entrance to a round pipe full of air created using void fill tool. I'm told my surface is an invalid shape.

 

What could I be doing wrong?

 

Thanks,

Jon.

 

Capture.GIF

Inventor 2013/Pro SP2
SimCFD 2015 SP2
Win7-64bit
7 REPLIES 7
Message 2 of 8
OmkarJ
in reply to: Cnoj

Probably the accuracy of the CAD package? I have faced similar problems with no apparent reason. Sometimes remodelling and reimporting to SimCFD helps. Otherwise, you have to model the necessarily long inlet for fully developed flow.

Message 3 of 8
Cnoj
in reply to: OmkarJ

The model was direct from inventor 2010: Sketched circle, extruded then shelled and sent to Sim CFD using Inventor add-in button.

 

If I have to use the workaround, how long is 'necessarily long' ?

 

Thanks,

Jon.

 

 

Inventor 2013/Pro SP2
SimCFD 2015 SP2
Win7-64bit
Message 4 of 8
OmkarJ
in reply to: Cnoj

Sure, I understood it was a direct import from Inventor, but I have seen such incosistencies happening occaisionally. A conjecture would be that the insuficient accuracy (or precision) of Inventor CAD definition is causing this. Perhaps Autodesk personnel can add more on this. Btw, why model a shell, why not just model the flow domain inside?

 

As for the workaround, the development length for fully developed flow (for a circular pipe) is well documented:

Turbulent flow: L/D = 4.4 Re^(1/6)

Laminar flow:  L/D = 0.06 Re

 

That said, of course the best measure of a developed flow is the one that has no velocity gradients in the flow direction, ie, velocity in streamwise direction along any line parallel to axis should be constant.

 

Cheers

Omkar

Message 5 of 8
Cnoj
in reply to: OmkarJ

Well this was just an experimental simulation in preparation for something more complex using existing CAD models. Are there any advantages on the CFD side of things to starting with a flow domain cad model over viod filling a hollow cad model?

 

Thanks for developed length info.

 

Jon

 

Inventor 2013/Pro SP2
SimCFD 2015 SP2
Win7-64bit
Message 6 of 8
OmkarJ
in reply to: Cnoj

Often the 3D models used for creating drawings are very detailed and have many small components/features that may not be too influential on the flow field. Moreover, if there are any gaps, you will have to do a lot of cleanup before you begin meshing. Hence I typically model the domain separately, omitting the unnecessary details. 

 

The other advantage I see is that you can easily decompose/slice the geometry to have separate parts in the critical areas of high gradients where you can use a fine mesh. You can use "regions" feature in SimCFD for this, but I don't think it is robust and recently discovered a bug in it as well.

 

Filling the void may be very useful in cases like castings. But even there, I tend to use Inventor (Delete faces > Sculpt/Stictch etc) to extract the domain, and then decompose it wherever necessary to have a better mesh distribution. 

 

That said, of course, every engineer has their own style. I was talking about my personal preference 🙂

Message 7 of 8
apolo_vanderberg
in reply to: Cnoj

Jon

From the sounds of it you generated the solid pipe in Inventor and then (i would imagine) used the Geometry Tools within CFD to create the interior fluid?

 

There are some instances where I've seen that the Surface generated by the Geomtetry Tools does prevent the Fully Developed condition from being applied.

 

You may want to try cad'ing a 'cap" to seal the geometry (as this is your test case and you could do this feasibly for your real model) and then assign the Fully Developed condition to the external face of the cap (which would be assigned as part of the fluid domain).

 

Apolo

Message 8 of 8
Cnoj
in reply to: apolo_vanderberg

'From the sounds of it you generated the solid pipe in Inventor and then (i would imagine) used the Geometry Tools within CFD to create the interior fluid?'

 

Yup exactly.

 

Thanks for the work-around.

 

Jon.

Inventor 2013/Pro SP2
SimCFD 2015 SP2
Win7-64bit

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.

Post to forums  

Autodesk Design & Make Report