support of beam

[faisal.aaouatif]

Please take o look to the attachement above and tell me how can i resolve the pb.

thank you.

note : beams were calculated and exported from RSA2013 to beams module 2013.

[Rafal.Gaweda]

PLease send us this model.

[faisal.aaouatif]

big model ...

way to send it please.

thx

[Rafal.Gaweda]

www.wetransfer.com

www.filemail.com

or ftp

[faisal.aaouatif]

ok

sent by wetransfer.com to mailer@lithium.com.

thanks

[Rafal.Gaweda]

sent by wetransfer.com to mailer@lithium.com.

Send it to you and copy link to file into forum post or send me by Private Message.

[faisal.aaouatif]

link below

http://wtrns.fr/n4b_C67e2-VVwwR

thanks

[A.wikipedia]

file of you erro.

See picture

[Rafal.Gaweda]

---

A.wikipedia wrote:

file of you erro.

See picture

Download again. Fiel size should be 268 198 650

[faisal.aaouatif]

ok

i used Ftp site as per demand on private mail.

hope it works now.

Thank you

[Rafal.Gaweda]

I got the file. Checking it.

[Rafal.Gaweda]

Lack of supports on drawings is caused by supporting beams by panels \ walls.

Workaround here (applying elastic support with very low kz but correct size = panel thickness) : http://screencast.com/t/VykkkP4rc5

[faisal.aaouatif · Accepted solution]

Ok Rafal

Thank you.

ive noticed that workflow between RSA and  beams reinforcement module (may be with other reinforcement module too) is not  very smooth as it should be .... (should rename beams after export , Pb with reinforcement shapes ... )

i hope that efforts will be done in this direction.

Thank you

[gustavo_c_vasconcellos]

Hi Faisal, I agree with you.

I believe that future is BIM, and it starts with architectural project, then we will module in Revit Structure, then send to Robot and to ASD to final drawings and detailings.

Nowadays, it has been easier to import a 2D drawings to Robot and do everying there ... but it doesn't make sense, it goes against to our "desired productivity".

 Rafal and Artur, it would be great if the transition, transformation, from a 3D project (Revit) would be smoother than today. It would be a competitive advantage for Autodesk and for us ...

[faisal.aaouatif]

Same Problem of lack of support when having beams connected between them.( beams support of another one)

if doing the same trick as with a panel ( see above ) , the support added is concidered for both of two beams.

is there anyway to avoid this problem too.

thx

[gustavo_c_vasconcellos]

Thanks Faisal

[Rafal.Gaweda]

---

 Rafal and Artur, it would be great if the transition, transformation, from a 3D project (Revit) would be smoother than today. It would be a competitive advantage for Autodesk and for us ...

---

So if you  have revit files not properly transfered to robot please send them us.

Real users' model are welcome to be checked.

[Rafal.Gaweda]

---

faisal.aaouatif wrote:

Same Problem of lack of support when having beams connected between them.( beams support of another one)

What is your situation in model?

IN my simple test example it works: http://screencast.com/t/LybyCykAlyp

[faisal.aaouatif]

the calculation of beams in this situation are ok ( supports are took ito account ) but the problem is rised when generating drawing ( same pb when support are panels mentionned above). - See attachement please.

thx

[Rafal.Gaweda]

 but the problem is rised when generating drawing 

This issue is known, planned to be corrected.