Robot Structural Analysis Forum
Welcome to Autodesk’s Robot Structural Analysis Forums. Share your knowledge, ask questions, and explore popular Robot Structural Analysis topics.
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

SLS combination

22 REPLIES 22
SOLVED
Reply
Message 1 of 23
Jorgew09
5738 Views, 22 Replies

SLS combination

When I'm trying to calculate required reinforcement for slabs, as well as beams. I get the folowing error: "Required types are not ascribed to SLS combinations. Calculations may be incorrect."

 

Whats wrong? 

22 REPLIES 22
Message 21 of 23
Andyf88
in reply to: Jorgew09

Sorry, any idea why SLS when acting alone, compared to ULS, gives:

1. higher reinforcement

2. and why it gives reinforcement at the bottom of the slab in the area under columns, (usually expected top reinforcement only in this area)?

Thank you.
Message 22 of 23
Artur.Kosakowski
in reply to: Andyf88

As I wrote the algorithm is not optimized for running SLS cases only but in general:

 

1. Keeping cracks under the defined limit may require more reinforcement than is required to fulfill strength requirements. In addition you may see the increase of reinforcement if you mark reduction of the deflection by increase of (SLS) reinforcement.

2. In may be the attempt to increase 'cracked' slab thickness stiffness for the correction of the deflection or compression reinforcement in case you have very high bending moment.

 

If you find your post answered press the Accept as Solution button please. This will help other users to find solutions much faster. Thank you.



Artur Kosakowski
Message 23 of 23
Andyf88
in reply to: Artur.Kosakowski

Artur,

Thank you very much, very helpful.

Regards,

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.

Post to forums  

Autodesk Design & Make Report