Discussion Groups

Robot Structural Analysis

Reply
Contributor
ovedmata
Posts: 17
Registered: ‎11-02-2011

seismic load application?

568 Views, 3 Replies
11-28-2011 07:47 PM

What's the best way to apply a seismic load or wind load to a 3D structure? I've modeled a 3 story buidling, with a non-recatungular geometry, and I'd like to know what the best way to apply the these loads are?

 

my wind/snow 2D/3D is greyed out.

 

Do I just apply the loads to every member, or  is there a faster way?

 

thanks,

 

 

Oved.

p.s. I keep trying to run a search on this forum and nothing happens. It doesn't work. Any ideas?

Please use plain text.
Product Support
Artur.Kosakowski
Posts: 5,115
Registered: ‎12-17-2010

Re: seismic load application?

11-29-2011 12:03 AM in reply to: ovedmata

The seismic load is generated automatically after you define seismic analysis cases. Depending on your model you can either define wind load case as loads applied to each of elements or use a cladding (surface) load with automatic distribution of loads to 'supporting' elements. The wind 2D/3D option is in fact based on the cladding load definition and is available for selected climatic codes.

 

In case of problems with the search option try to reload the forum site.

 

If you find your post answered press the Accept as Solution button please. This will help other users to find solutions much faster. Thank you.



Artur Kosakowski
Please use plain text.
Contributor
ovedmata
Posts: 17
Registered: ‎11-02-2011

Re: seismic load application?

12-02-2011 04:07 PM in reply to: Artur.Kosakowski

"use a cladding (surface) load with automatic distribution of loads to 'supporting' elements"

 

Can you elaborate on this? Or is there  a suporting document for it?

Ive tried adding a cladding contour in the zy plane of the building and the zx, but It just doesn't feel right.

All help appreciated.

 

Thank you,

 

Oved

 

Please use plain text.
Contributor
ovedmata
Posts: 17
Registered: ‎11-02-2011

Re: seismic load application?

12-02-2011 09:28 PM in reply to: ovedmata

:-) Nevermind. I got it.

 

Thank you!! :smileyvery-happy:

Please use plain text.