Questions by calculations and program development

[Anonymous]

Why RSA 2012 there are no updated russian SNiPs on a steel and concrete? In new editions SNiPs there are important changes by calculations

Edited by
Discussion_Admin

[Jakub.Brozonowicz · Accepted solution]

It may not be accurately expressed, but in response to this post in another topic, I wrote that this forum will not be a place for exchange of information on development plans.
We assume that we are discussing about the program and its functionalities.

During these discussions, Wwe describe how in our opinion of users should work.
Therefore, do not get the answer why the changes were not made ​​but only to ensure that we will do our best to as soon as they have been taken into consideration.

Could you explain these changes other users forum involved?

[Pushkin_spb]

Dear Sirs!

Robot software is a powerful easy for use and widely used in Renaissance Construction office for design of complicated structures and buildings. A state expertise positive conclusion is required to get a construction permit.

A good software has a postprocessor for reinforced concrete strength calculation based on a valid national code.

The first question at State Expertise is if a software has a Russian national code certification or verification.

If an answer is "Yes" the second question is what Russian norms are used for strength and deflection calculations.

A valid code is SNiP 52-01-2003. If we say a truth that Robot uses invalid  SNiP 2.03.01-84*, then an expert says that a presented Robot strength and deflection calculation are not valid and no positive expertise conclusion is received.

This is a serious obstacle of Robot usage.

There are a lot of differences between SNiP 52-01-2003 and SNiP 2.03.01-84* and there is no need to compare them at this message. 

If AutoDESK keeps a situation at the present state leads to a reduction of Robot users number.

Would anyone advise on this matter?

Alexander Sivitsky.