Dear All,
How am I supposed to model overhead crane which rests on columns gussets and which is also a part of the structure?
Suppose that I have gable like industrial structure an I have overhead crane(50 ton capacity) located at the middle of the columns. Which design path should I follow to correctly model the crane and also the gusset plates at the columns where is crane supposed to rest ?
Your guidance will be appreciated.
Regards,
Solved! Go to Solution.
Solved by luzer333. Go to Solution.
Solved by sonyablade2010. Go to Solution.
Solved by AJA14. Go to Solution.
Hi. I had a project with overhead cranes ranging from 20 tons to 180 tons. I tried several different methods for modeling but the best I could come up with is as follows:
1- model all the structural supporting elements but not the overhead cane.
2- perform a manual calculation to calculate the horizontal (both directions) and vertical loads and moments applicable to the columns supporting the runway beams.
3- create manual crane load combinations to take into account all the different load applications.
4- After analysis and design of steel structure, verify the runway beam using manual calculations to make sure the results are comparable to those from robot.
This is my input but I am sure others may have different approaches.
Hope this helps.
Thanks for helping,
@AJA14 wrote:Hi. I had a project with overhead cranes ranging from 20 tons to 180 tons. I tried several different methods for modeling but the best I could come up with is as follows:
1- model all the structural supporting elements but not the overhead cane.
2- perform a manual calculation to calculate the horizontal (both directions) and vertical loads and moments applicable to the columns supporting the runway beams.
3- create manual crane load combinations to take into account all the different load applications.
4- After analysis and design of steel structure, verify the runway beam using manual calculations to make sure the results are comparable to those from robot.
This is my input but I am sure others may have different approaches.
Hope this helps.
Yes probably that will be the path I'll follow to design a structure which has a overhead crane. I'm convinced that you just counted on your engineering judgment and intuiton on that.To take into account overhead crane loads and comprise the load combination including wind, self, live, crane ,seismic, wind, snow etc.. loads should be enough to design structural stability and member size checking. Of course I'm not trying to take into account the crane girders as part of system, that should be taken smply as statci or dynamic loading, that is for sure.I would lie to draw your attention and little problem arises in my head on how to corectly design the gusset of the crane on the column side. My best approach would be to model the gusset as a frame element protruded horizontally from the column side(where I'll apply the crane loads) and based on the max. axial, shear, moment force acting on that protruded frame element, design the gusset plate manually?Your comments will be appreciated,Regards,
Hi. Yes that would be my best approach for designing the brackets. Remember that when you model these brackets in Robot to make sure that you use the correct length and offset it to the face of the column otherwise you would be basing your design on a larger unbraced length. (Unless you do the calculations manually).
Example 5 in the following document might help you
http://images.autodesk.com/adsk/files/robot_2010_training_manual_metric.pdf
Dear All,
Thank you all in advance,
AJA14 :
Sure I'll do it the way you describe it, in order to take into account and not underestimate the bracing lengths, for FEM models its crucial to have all the model to be comprised on nodal basis, and all the frame/bar elements are supposed to connect and transfer loads only from those nodes, except if you don't have the cantilevers(where it may have unsupported and free node)
Luzer333's example has brought the new dimension:
Since its the official article from RSA I presume that its the legitimate way of doing it and recommended way by RSA developer team.
In the 5th example, they modeled the brackets/gussets as small triangular-frame formation for 2,3,4 (left side) and 7,8,9(right side) frame members. This also seems very rational way of implementing it but at the same time poses the difficulties for. For example,
Your comments willl be appreciated.
Why don't you just put the horizontal profile and apply all the crane loads including the railway on it? It will transfer all the loads acting on it to the column as it would in reality. I think replacing the "full" profile with haunched one won't change a lot because the railway generally sits on the middle of the profile where it is unchanged till the end (to the column). Additionally you can still add brackets under the "full" profile with Connection Design.
@luzer333 wrote:Why don't you just put the horizontal profile and apply all the crane loads including the railway on it? It will transfer all the loads acting on it to the column as it would in reality. I think replacing the "full" profile with haunched one won't change a lot because the railway generally sits on the middle of the profile where it is unchanged till the end (to the column). Additionally you can still add brackets under the "full" profile with Connection Design.
OK
Having the collegues all over the world which shares the same opinion and reasoning with me, helps me a lot to keep the sanity and put me in ease.
Luzer333 If you have more manuals/articles related to RSA do you mind to share them with us ?
Thank you all,
You can visit
http://usa.autodesk.com/adsk/servlet/index?siteID=123112&id=13093279
Also a lot helpful videos on youtube. Unfortunately most of them are in various of languages.