Robot Structural Analysis Forum
Welcome to Autodesk’s Robot Structural Analysis Forums. Share your knowledge, ask questions, and explore popular Robot Structural Analysis topics.
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Reply
Message 1 of 6
hilda08
507 Views, 5 Replies

hollow slab

i changed my hollow slab to a bigger one, but when i did, the ratio for the beams got smaller. shouldent it be lagrer? 

5 REPLIES 5
Message 2 of 6
Rafal.Gaweda
in reply to: hilda08

It depends on stiffeness of whole this system. Play with different slab thicknesses \ beam sizes and look at results.



Rafal Gaweda
Message 3 of 6
hilda08
in reply to: Rafal.Gaweda

i have to have a certian tickness of the slab, but i dont understand why the ratio of the beams got lower when then slab got bigger. 

Message 4 of 6
Rafal.Gaweda
in reply to: hilda08

 

 

slaband beams.jpg

 

slabrel.jpg



Rafal Gaweda
Message 5 of 6
jenyzosin
in reply to: hilda08

When the slab have a biger height, the rigidity of the slab is biger and the beams can't deform.

My advise is to create a thin slab (like 7 or 8 cm ) and the diference of weight (til 30 cm) you give as a surface load on slab. I use this metod when I want to increase the ratio for beams. 

There's a fine line between genius and insanity. I have erased this line - O.L.
Message 6 of 6
Artur.Kosakowski
in reply to: hilda08

Hilda,

 

Please check also:

 

http://forums.autodesk.com/t5/Autodesk-Robot-Structural/unrealistic-beams/m-p/3390693/

 

http://forums.autodesk.com/t5/Autodesk-Robot-Structural/Beam-offsets/m-p/3332921/

 

Hope this help you understand this situation even better.



Artur Kosakowski

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.

Post to forums