Robot Structural Analysis Forum
Welcome to Autodesk’s Robot Structural Analysis Forums. Share your knowledge, ask questions, and explore popular Robot Structural Analysis topics.
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Deformation Problems with Rigid Links

5 REPLIES 5
SOLVED
Reply
Message 1 of 6
Anonymous
763 Views, 5 Replies

Deformation Problems with Rigid Links

Hello,

 

i am working in a model that combines rigid links to introduce the forces with unidirectional releases. 

Apparently analysis seems to be correct at the bottom of the structure. 

 

The problems are related with deformed shape at the top of the structure, as show next:

 

deformation.png

Can you explain what is happening?

Thanks,

DFI

Tags (1)
5 REPLIES 5
Message 2 of 6
Rafal.Gaweda
in reply to: Anonymous

zip file corrupted.
Please try again to attach working zip


Rafal Gaweda
Message 3 of 6
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous
Message 4 of 6
Rafal.Gaweda
in reply to: Anonymous

The beam 19 is disjointed (case 7) from short elements because of unidirection releases defined on short elelemnts.

You may see in in Displacement table - uz values in these nodes.



Rafal Gaweda
Message 5 of 6
Anonymous
in reply to: Rafal.Gaweda

Hello,

 

The main question is how can this nodes presents positive displacements with applied loads (descendent loads).

 

 

barra.jpgThanks,

DFI

Message 6 of 6
Rafal.Gaweda
in reply to: Anonymous

This situation (in case 7) is in fact unreal because beam 19 in this case is weightless and then tube is not pushed to the rest of structure.

So it is suggested to set this case as auxiliary and use it nonlinear combination(s) considering selfweight of this tube and  \ or load applied to this tube

 

But the explanation is:

loads in case 7 make the nodes  46 47 51to54  to move downards ; the releases at top nodes of these short elements  create connections between beam 19 and top nodes when compression in connections occur; top nodes moving downwards produce tension in connection so releases (working on compression only) disjoin beam 19 from the short elements; so in fact every state  \ location of beam 19 is correct from calculation point of view ; even falling down to ground level 😉

 

Hope it is more clear now.



Rafal Gaweda

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.

Post to forums  

Autodesk Design & Make Report