Revit MEP

Reply
Valued Contributor
mothball
Posts: 55
Registered: ‎04-15-2008
Message 1 of 4 (334 Views)

Revit vs. Design Master

334 Views, 3 Replies
07-10-2009 07:30 AM
My office currently has Revit MEP. I've been asked to review a product called Design Master in regard to electrical design.

Has anyone reveiwed this software in comparison to revit MEP? Thoughts?
Distinguished Mentor
Jrobker
Posts: 533
Registered: ‎09-29-2008
Message 2 of 4 (334 Views)

Re: Revit vs. Design Master

07-10-2009 12:07 PM in reply to: mothball
I played a little bit in it. It was buggy, and crashed commands constantly. I don't think i had a solid install. When I got the rep on the phone he got it working through webex.
pros
1. it's vertical in a friendly familiar interface...autocad.
2. Most of the elements lacking in revit can be done in DM.
3. Easy to learn.

cons
1. exporting to a BIM enviroment doesn't produce data driven elements only solids.
2. Trying to coordinate with other trades in revit. you have to export a Arch model from revit and import into cad enviroment.
3. Performance of machines in 3D rich (sold, polyface) enviroment.
3. interoperability.
4. Autde$k is a monopoly and revit will be "the" program.

You may disagree, but you can only deside for yourself. Play with it, you may like it.
"It's hardware that makes a machine fast. It's software that makes a fast machine slow."

Active Contributor
aielli
Posts: 32
Registered: ‎03-07-2006
Message 3 of 4 (334 Views)

Re: Revit vs. Design Master

07-30-2009 02:31 PM in reply to: mothball
Design Master support is top notch. If you find a bug in the software, the developers will send you a fix within a few days, usually within a few hours. They are also very responsive to feature requests.

I can't dump on Revit MEP too much since I've only used it a handful of times, but I did not find it intuitive or very customizable. I spent a lot of time waiting for objects to move, views to change, and files to save. I also like being able to use LISP and VBA to quickly write routines for repetitive tasks. I believe the only way to manipulate Revit is through the .NET APIs, which aren't all that easy to pickup and run with. (Did MEP get the VSTO? IDE yet?)

Once you get a feel for how DM works, the workflow is intuitive and fast. If you've written LISP or VBA to use with AutoCAD, most likely these routines will work with DM. The database they use is not locked, so you can create your own custom software to query DM items in the database. (undocumented feature... proceed at your own risk..)

The software used to crash a lot, but the later releases are pretty stable.

If your client wants a MEP Revit model, Design Master is probably not the way to go, but if you're deliverables are just the plotsheets, I think Design Master is going to save you a lot of time.
New Member
kwoznicki
Posts: 1
Registered: ‎08-14-2009
Message 4 of 4 (334 Views)

Re: Revit vs. Design Master

08-14-2009 06:19 AM in reply to: mothball
I use both Revit 2009 and Design Master. I like using DM a lot more than Revit because of speed and customization. It's a straight forward process in DM. What I do is do everything in DM and then link the DM drawing to a Revit view, and then when a view needs updating, just update it in Revit. The only drawback, which I'm trying to figure out now, is the plines in AutoCad, which make up the homerun arrows, come in as one width.
Post to the Community

Have questions about Autodesk products? Ask the community.

New Post
Need installation help?

Start with some of our most frequented solutions or visit the Installation and Licensing Forum to get help installing your software.