Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
Show only
|
Search instead for
Did you mean:
This page has been translated for your convenience with an automatic translation service. This is not an official translation and may contain errors and inaccurate translations. Autodesk does not warrant, either expressly or implied, the accuracy, reliability or completeness of the information translated by the machine translation service and will not be liable for damages or losses caused by the trust placed in the translation service.Translate
So,,,,,,,, is Revit Systems going to be more intuitive and easier to use than ABS? I've got to tell you that ABS is as tough to work in as Arch Desktop. When I moved from Arch Desktop to Revit, I couldn't believe how much easier Revit was to work in. I hope the same is true with Revit Systems. If anyone has tried it, please let us know.
If you can use Revit, systems shouldn't be much of a leap at all. The
interface looks just like Revit Building to me.
wrote in message news:5125417@discussion.autodesk.com...
So,,,,,,,, is Revit Systems going to be more intuitive and easier to use
than ABS? I've got to tell you that ABS is as tough to work in as Arch
Desktop. When I moved from Arch Desktop to Revit, I couldn't believe how
much easier Revit was to work in. I hope the same is true with Revit
Systems. If anyone has tried it, please let us know.
Can you tell if all the content (parts) are available in Systems that are in ABS? Does it appear that the product is the same as ABS only built on the Revit platform?
Sorry, have to wait for someone else to chime in... I've never even touched
ABS (hated ADT, so just sat on my hands till I caught wind of the revit
version)
wrote in message news:5125593@discussion.autodesk.com...
Can you tell if all the content (parts) are available in Systems that are in
ABS? Does it appear that the product is the same as ABS only built on the
Revit platform?
