Revit Architecture Forum
Welcome to Autodesk’s Revit Architecture Forums. Share your knowledge, ask questions, and explore popular Revit Architecture topics.
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Revit Architecture System Requirements

6 REPLIES 6
Reply
Message 1 of 7
ragde07
368 Views, 6 Replies

Revit Architecture System Requirements

I currently have revit 9.1 installed on my machine and noticed that when i upgraded from Revit 8.1 the Revit was slower. I am looking into installing Revit Architecture but would like to know if my system will be enough to support the software.

My system:
Pentium 4, 3.00 Ghz
2 GB of Ram
NVidia GeForce FX 5200

Will this be enough with out having my computer crash when inputting walls? I will not be Rendering from my station
6 REPLIES 6
Message 2 of 7
Anonymous
in reply to: ragde07

just walls? Sure! If you ended up with a complete model that was
approaching 150-200 megs, you'd need to upgrade the RAM to 4 gigs and turn
on the windows 3 Gig switch.

wrote in message news:5635949@discussion.autodesk.com...
I currently have revit 9.1 installed on my machine and noticed that when i
upgraded from Revit 8.1 the Revit was slower. I am looking into installing
Revit Architecture but would like to know if my system will be enough to
support the software.

My system:
Pentium 4, 3.00 Ghz
2 GB of Ram
NVidia GeForce FX 5200

Will this be enough with out having my computer crash when inputting walls?
I will not be Rendering from my station
Message 3 of 7
mmcgarch
in reply to: ragde07

Version 9.1 to Revit 2008 .
you will see that it will be slower
Message 4 of 7
ragde07
in reply to: ragde07

Will the slower response be worth the added features that 2008 has? My computer is currently maxed out. I don't want to have to buy a new computer just to run Revit Arch 2008.
Message 5 of 7
Anonymous
in reply to: ragde07

I have not had any slowdown when using Revit 2008 over 9.1. If anything,
it's slightly faster for be because it handles regerenartion of views and
shadows better.

And the new features of 2008 are definatley worth upgrading to.


wrote in message news:5638719@discussion.autodesk.com...
Will the slower response be worth the added features that 2008 has? My
computer is currently maxed out. I don't want to have to buy a new computer
just to run Revit Arch 2008.
Message 6 of 7
mmcgarch
in reply to: ragde07

My HP laptop has the same Spec as yours. Works great.
I use a desktop in the office for rendering large projects


"ragde07" wrote in message news:5638719@discussion.autodesk.com...
Will the slower response be worth the added features that 2008 has? My
computer is currently maxed out. I don't want to have to buy a new computer
just to run Revit Arch 2008.
Message 7 of 7
Kal-LT
in reply to: ragde07

me neither get no issues from 9.1 to 2008. And actually the file format is more compressed than 9.1.
In example a project of 52MB in RB9.1 after upgrade(save in 2008) went to 39MB (a gain of 25%) plus the new features are so cool....I will suggest to add some memory to your computer. 2GB of RAM is to short.
The factory recommends 4GB of RAM (on your system it will shows only 3.5GB - windows oblige.)

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.

Post to forums  

Autodesk Design & Make Report


Autodesk Design & Make Report