Short version of question:
Is there a limit to the number of times the Rendering tool can be fully used on a project (student version of RAC2010)? (i.e. "fully" meaning not only "render" using the Rendering dialog on the View Control bar at the bottom of a 3D camera view, but also either "save to project" or "export" after the rendering process is complete.) In the practice project which I am using to learn about the rendering capabilities, I used the rendering dialog box (including "save..." or "export" tools) about ten (10) times before it stopped working. If there are limitations to the student version, is there a document where I can see a list of them?
Long version with more info:
I was experimenting with and learning about the capabilities of the rendering tool (RAC2010 - student version being used by a still unemployed architect learning Revit [thank you, Autodesk, it's a great program.]) and was making progress when the "Export" button stopped working. At the same time, the "Save to Project" tool stopped working. These buttons "felt" like they were working (the PC "chirped" because of increased CPU usage, etc.) but the exported file never appeared in the folder that I sent it to, and after a save-to-project the new view did not appear in the Revit project browser (and the naming box did not pop-up.) I tried it several times with no success. I closed Revit, restarted my PC, opened Revit, rendering it again, tried both the "export" and "save to project" buttons, and still nothing. I only have 2gigs of RAM so I thought that might be the problem; my practice file is about 38megs and is mostly a topo surface that I created, but I created several small "buildings" in separate files (each building is mainly consisting of exterior walls, roofs, and some floors with no detail on any of them) and linked them into my topo "project". The links haven't added much size to the topo file and it's now about 40megs. I "simplified" the topo surface using the Revit tool, but that didn't change it much (knocked out about 250 kilobytes.) I'm going to add some RAM this week; probably 1 or 2gigs (which will give me 3 or 4gigs total) depending on how much my PC board can access and use effectively. However, I noticed a discussion group thread from someone else having the same problem with these two buttons on the Rendering menu, and that person has 3gigs of RAM so I don't think that RAM is the problem (that person's thread had not been replied to by anyone else yet.) Revit seems to be rendering the camera views well, the "Export" and "Save to Project" buttons appear to be active, but as mentioned above they don't return any results.
I opened one of the other little files I created (less than 3megs) and tried to render one of them. The system allowed me to use the "export" button and the "save to project" button on that "project", and both of the buttons returned the anticipated results (added a "rendered view" to the renderings in the project browser and a jpeg to the file I sent it to. I'm starting to think that maybe Autodesk limits the number of rendering "exports" and "save to project" attempts per project. I doubt it, but if so, if anyone knows where a place where I can see a list of limitations on the student version of Revit, please direct me to it. I need to know if what appears to be an unresponsive tool is simply a programmed limitation.
Note to Autodesk: Thanks again for your student programs. When I become employed again (hopefully soon), it will be with a company using Revit or one that is strongly considering a switch from CAD to Revit. I'm a CAD person from the late 80's: the days of Intergraph's APDP on DEC equipment, then PC version of Bentley's MicroStation, and then switched to AutoCAD and ADT3.3. Revit 2010 is the best!
Thanks in advance for any help on the above problem.
Once upon a time, the Student version was "fully functional." It did everything a regular version did, except that it put a watermark on the plots. If you made a family with the Student version and used it on your "legitimate" version, the watermark would show up there. And was nearly impossible to get rid of.
Just wondering if the Student version still does the watermark? I'm afraid to try it.
@dplumb_BWBR wrote:
Once upon a time, the Student version was "fully functional." It did everything a regular version did, except that it put a watermark on the plots. If you made a family with the Student version and used it on your "legitimate" version, the watermark would show up there. And was nearly impossible to get rid of.
Just wondering if the Student version still does the watermark? I'm afraid to try it.
Plotting from an educational version still leaves a watermark on the border. Otherwise, it is fully functional.
Wow, that was quick!
Thanks, Jeff.
What about bringing a "student" family in to the office? Does the watermark transfer into the project? Or is the watermark only on the Student machine, and doesn't go with the file?
I'm investigating this because (hooray!) we're starting to hire people back again, and several of them had taken classes or took advantage to the "Displaced Worker" program. I'm worried that if they created a really cool family at home, they might bring it in to work and screw up one of our office projects.
@dplumb_BWBR wrote:
Wow, that was quick!
Thanks, Jeff.
What about bringing a "student" family in to the office? Does the watermark transfer into the project? Or is the watermark only on the Student machine, and doesn't go with the file?
I'm investigating this because (hooray!) we're starting to hire people back again, and several of them had taken classes or took advantage to the "Displaced Worker" program. I'm worried that if they created a really cool family at home, they might bring it in to work and screw up one of our office projects.
Content developed on a student version of Revit does NOT carry the watermark with it the way a DWG file does. Of course authoring in a student version and using for commercial work is "technically" a violation of the student license agreement.
On the bright side I am glad to hear you are starting to hire again. You know I am a Minnesota guy (you are too right?), and I have plenty of Architect friends in the Minneapolis St. Paul area who could use good news.