tools are available to print pdf files that were created to "not print".
same will be true if dwf comes out with a "no print" option. anything that
can be "secured" can be un-secured. the "no-print" features are merely a
deterrent, not a preventative. We typically use a "not for construction" or
"progress note" on the plans if they are preliminary. dwg files are only
sent if a release has been signed. sometimes a retainer is required before
work begins. interesting discussion....
best wishes.
--
Brian Earsley
www.arete3.com
18645 South West Creek Drive
Tinley Park, Illinois 60477
708.342.1250 x.225
"Dustin" wrote in message
news:5678404@discussion.autodesk.com...
actually, after thinking about it this afternoon, I have had sensitive
governmental clients that are very strict about there stuff floating around.
Maybe being able to lock down the DWF would ease there issues with sending
out files. We are not even allowed to post to buzzsaw on some type
projects. Now if we could get the DWF to lock and setup a timeout (self
distruct) that would be perfect for these type clients.
wrote in message news:5678381@discussion.autodesk.com...
thanks Dustin- the way you put it has caused me to
re-think the whole thing.. i can see why autodesk
provided a read-only publishing feature for DWF with
Inventor because ideas for inventions are much more sensitive than
architectural..
watermarks "not for construction" and "not for presentation"
may be just as useful in the long run as read-only DWF files..
i think i'm going to hold my thoughts on this for awhile now
that autodesk knows about it and see what they do with it..
seems like the read-only publishing feature should be there
anyway since it is there for Inventor.. but if there are good
reasons why Revit doesn't have it- then autodesk would know.. autodesk is
the best in the world..