I seem to remember a solar-system-scale AutoCAD dwg with a little plaque on
the moon landing site.
Cheesy though it may have been, I think it was created in order to rub
uStn's nose in it.
Now, next week, I've got to start design work on a Dyson Sphere. Will I be
able to use Revit or will I need to stick with AutoCAD?
"Scott D Davis (Autodesk)" wrote in message
news:6347199@discussion.autodesk.com...
I agree with you there. One of the founders posted a while ago on AUGI (i
think?) why the limitation was there for very small line segments. I'll see
if I can find it as it made some sense.
"Matt Stachoni" <...> wrote in message
news:6346817@discussion.autodesk.com...
On Mon, 1 Mar 2010 16:30:20 -0800, Scott D Davis \(Autodesk\)
wrote:
>Not true. AutoCAD is not any more accurate than Revit. In some cases
>Revit
>is more accurate due to the way AutoCAD handles rounding of decimal places
>in long decimal numbers.
Okay, but you have to admit the fact that Revit can't draw little line
segments
under 3/64" is kind of weird. Not that it matters much in day to day life,
but
when importing high-quality CAD detail linework, it is a pain.
Matt
matt@stachoni.com