I am collaborating withb another architect and In the situation with copy monitor, when the architect #1 is doing all the interior and architect #2 is doing the exterior. Architect #1 generates the floor slab. Architect #2 copy/monitors the floor slab using the same settings (after linked revit file by architect #1 is loaded). The slab then is part of architect #2's model and then makes changes to align with wall at an exterior wall. Revit then recognizes that there is a difference between both models and then a Coordination Review is required. However, architect #2 makes the change which prompts that Coordination Review. What happens when architect #2 then sends architect #1 revit model to be linked into project? Revit doesn't recognize change from architect #2 when revit model is linked into architect #1 file? Why? It seems that this would be more productive than always having to contact architect #1 to modify slab to the needs of architect #2. Copy monitor slab then seems to be irrelevant for architect #2 and having to rely on architect #1 to make changes. Am I missing something in this process?
I am open to comments on this topic, and can be reached via replies to this email or by phone at the number below.
An advice from experienced users and BIM managers is to use Copy/Monitor for levels and grids, only. The other stuff can be coordinated in the old way, with simple communication, phone calls, etc, to avoid the headache/nightmare. Levels and grids are essential, and Copy/Monitor is good for that.
Kim, Copy/Monitor only works one way. What needs to happen is Arch #1 need to link Arch #2 model, adjust his slab to the Exterior walls as needed. That way when #2 reloads, the slab is where it need to be for arch 2.