Thanks for your respond.
I have seen that is much better than MDT2. And I will try your
suggestion tomorrow a work. At this time I a'm really depressed of
setting up MDT5. My biggest problem is that I didn't really work
according to the ISO standards. If I had done that, it wouldn't have
given me all this problems.
I must say that I now quite understand the principles of the printing
part. And I think that that is solved.
Thanks again, Martien
Mark Case schreef:
>
> Martien,
>
> MDT5 is way, way better than MDT2.
>
> If your dims etc. don't look right... Try the "part options" command under
> the "part" menu. Set the base dimension style to what you were using in
> MDT2. Use amrefdim (2nd button over on the dim toolbar flyout)- - it works
> more like MDT2.
>
> If it looks right on the screen and doesn't print correctly, it is probably
> because A2Ki/MDT5 plotting is vastly different. You'll have to set up ctb
> (plot style table) & pc3 (plotter configuration) files and possibly use
> page setups. I have found that getting plots to look right on a single
> printer/PC combination is fairly simple(if not straightforward.) Getting
> several networked machines to use the same pc3 files is another matter.
> Pc3's are highly sensitive to OS and printer driver version.
>
> There is quite a bit of information in the help system and on Adesk's web
> site.
>
> --
> Mark Case, P.E.
> Sr. Mechanical Engineer
> CaseCAD Engineering
> (509) 773-6247
> web: w3.gorge.net/casecad
> "Martien de Witte" wrote in message
> news:3A649146.C6322957@mail.ru...
> > Lately we bought an update from MDT2 to MDT5. Al I have is problems. Al
> > my problems are in the drawing mode (layout). I can't get a normale
> > drawing to be printed. And I see that I a'm not the only one. Setting up
> > the standards in Mechanical Options is to complicated.
> >
> > Now I got back to MDT2. Because I can there make a normale drawing. My
> > question, "A'm I the only one???????"
> >
> > regards, Martien from Holland