Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
Show only
|
Search instead for
Did you mean:
This page has been translated for your convenience with an automatic translation service. This is not an official translation and may contain errors and inaccurate translations. Autodesk does not warrant, either expressly or implied, the accuracy, reliability or completeness of the information translated by the machine translation service and will not be liable for damages or losses caused by the trust placed in the translation service.Translate
I haven't seen this posted here as of yet but have seen numerous posts and requests for the ability to add threads within the assembly environment since about 2008.
A co-worker ran across this issue just this morning and aside from having to do a derived part or use multi-bodies to accomplish his needs, why can't we simply have the ability to insert/create a thread feature at the assembly level?
This would support real world processes would it not? And isn't that the way most would prefer to model their parts/assemblies as?
How bout it ADesk, can we get some love on this matter? 2008 was a long time ago in software terms.
Recently a customer has asked for assistence with the machining functions in Weldments. We quickly realised that the Thread and Helix command were not available. Could these functions be added to make the two commands usable when executing the machine function?
Yes! It is very common, I have shafts that have a flange welded on them. Operation is ALWAYS to weld THEN machine faces, and diameters, and threads. I find it silly that it has not been addressed sooner.
Yes I completely agree with this!! We always have to work around this problem on a daily basis. I was really suprised the first time I noticed this, because the option is there, but it is grayed out. Please switch it on for us guys!
Lost count of how many times I have wanted to put threads into an assembly feature. Instead I have to use a derived part which botches my BOM structure and has to be overridden. This should be added to Inventor as a high priority in my personal opinion.
Why would you need to machine out the thread as a part of the post-welding process? Why not create the thread feature in the part itself rather than at the weldment-level?
If the assembly is a weldment, and the detail, or bar, in question is not finished at the weldment stage, then it would have to be turned afterwards with other machining. This is a very likely scenario. The round would be machined at final machining and the threads would have to be added at that time. Threading the rod ahead of time may cause the threaded portion of the assembly to be out of spec with other parts of the final machining.
This electronic mail transmission contains information from Joy Global Inc. which is confidential, and is intended only for the use of the proper Addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us immediately at the return address on this transmission, and delete this message and any attachments from your system. Unauthorized use, copying, disclosing, distributing, or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this transmission is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Privacy-JGI
Another reason is if a part is made of 2 parts, then you'd have to machine 2 parts vs. machining 1 weldment. As mentioned above easier and more efficient to machine 1 time to hold tolerances/specs. (i.e. keeping a flange for a wheel mount square to an axle/shaft).