Community
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
"rllthomas" <To
href="mailto:rllthomas@attbi.com">rllthomas@attbi.com> wrote in message
href="news:f14d775.0@WebX.maYIadrTaRb">news:f14d775.0@WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
be honest Leo some of the benchmarking I have seen shows XP to be slower than
W2K. I know people in the group feel other wise but I suspect it has a lot do
to with your specific hardware and which drivers are the most optimized, the
W2K ones or the XP ones.
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
"chris" <
href="mailto:chrisc@alumni.ucsd.edu">chrisc@alumni.ucsd.edu> wrote in
message
href="news:0EDE5D30396E2A67CD1B5E312C85E742@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb">news:0EDE5D30396E2A67CD1B5E312C8......
I have win2k at work and "winxp home" at home.
I'm just how "Slow" winxp home comparing to winxp
professional.
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
"rllthomas" <To
href="mailto:rllthomas@attbi.com">rllthomas@attbi.com> wrote in
message
href="news:f14d775.0@WebX.maYIadrTaRb">news:f14d775.0@WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
be honest Leo some of the benchmarking I have seen shows XP to be slower
than W2K. I know people in the group feel other wise but I suspect it has a
lot do to with your specific hardware and which drivers are the most
optimized, the W2K ones or the XP ones.