style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
"Laurence Yeandle" <Well
href="mailto:laurenceyeandle@supanet.com">laurenceyeandle@supanet.com>
wrote in message
href="news:60D4E25EDAA82EA7576777F212AF3029@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb">news:60D4E25EDAA82EA7576777F212A......
it was all going dandy, fiddled with projects in file open box then poof poof
poof poof..........$%*&% remove 6 5.3 opens for 5 milli
seconds ...*!$£"& remove 5.3 and try again that was a
day ago. Got 5.3 up and running phew, saw that cdilla
folder I'm not touching. It all started when I was discussing
NESTED PATHS who was that mmmmmm -- Laurence,--Brian
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
"jorgen" <bjornes@email.com>If
wrote in message
href="news:f120400.38@WebX.maYIadrTaRb">news:f120400.38@WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
you had no problems with C-dilla, regardless of norton, consider yourself a
very lucky individual.
Having to reauthorize IV, waiting some days to get the authorization-code
via mail, all due to IV crashing, and taking Windows down with a blue-screen
in enerving.
And of cource this usually happens when your in a hurry with
your project.
If C-dilla is considered customer-friendly, and to have no problems, I hope
they start putting it back into the US-licenses as well.
That should get
some massive, nasty responses here.
Jorgen
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px">
"edarlak" <The
href="mailto:edarlak@gemcor.com">edarlak@gemcor.com> schrieb im
Newsbeitrag
href="news:f120400.49@WebX.maYIadrTaRb">news:f120400.49@WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
"slowness" has nothing to do with particular data sets. All 4 machines that we
installed IV on are exibiting the same lag in performance. R6.exe takes about
2x times to load than 5.3, slowness of cursor in sketch mode is another
frustrating slow-down. Openning of files takes longer. R6 uses more ram for
the same files than 5.3 required. Graphics performace has degraded from what
it was in 5.3. Lets put it this way, I can say that nothing in R6 is faster
than it was in 5.3.
The only thing left that I have not tried is installing Win2k SP3. Nothing
else on the machines has changed except for the upgrading of Inventor. R6
simply requires more system resources than 5.3. The one machine that I set up
to give non-IV users access to .idw's for prining (because AutoDesk never
could get VoloView to work) can't even open up files without crashing, I get
the IV has used more than 80%... blah...blah...blah... until I get an IV.exe
error. Typical AutoDesk Code writing practice it seems (keeps the hardware
manufacturers happy though). Maybe I need to tell management all the engineers
need new computers every year!
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px">
"loop29" <I
href="mailto:falk.massmann@scansonic.de">falk.massmann@scansonic.de>
schrieb im Newsbeitrag
href="news:f120400.50@WebX.maYIadrTaRb">news:f120400.50@WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
have the comparison to a complete assembly of one of our products with 355
parts, showing in viewport with 10 Hz rotating in IV5.3 and IV6 with
poststatictics=1. Open a part in an assembly is much more faster than in
IV5.3. Sorry, but this data is completely confidential. No informations on
release date for SQ4 yet, but I will keep your informed when it´s there.
regards
Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.