Community
Inventor Forum
Welcome to Autodesk’s Inventor Forums. Share your knowledge, ask questions, and explore popular Inventor topics.
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Tube & pipe authoring best practices.

4 REPLIES 4
Reply
Message 1 of 5
awatt
655 Views, 4 Replies

Tube & pipe authoring best practices.

Could someone direct me to a 'best practices' discussion or other documentations regarding authoring parts for Tube & Pipe?

 

Particularly, I'm wondering how one should select the max & min engagement vaules.

 

I've looked at some of the content center parts, and they seem somewhat haphazard.  It seems odd to me that the min is set to 20% of the max.  I have a chart that gives hand-tight engagement for various NPT thread sizes, but I don't see those values being used in the default content center parts.

 

I'm also wondering how to determine the engagement values for JIC connections.  Perhaps an engagement of 0.0 where the 37 degree flanges contact?

4 REPLIES 4
Message 2 of 5
salariua
in reply to: awatt

I don't bother wtih having exact dimensions and engagements, nobody can bend or cut to CAD precision anyway.

 

You can have an engagement as "To Plane/Point" here's some info:

 

defining a maximum engagement plane.

 

You need to set your pipe minimum and increment length (in styles) to something really small like 0.001 so that the pipe can engage to your Plane/Point, and set your engagement percent to 100%.

 

527.jpg

 

 

From what I see the engagement percent takes into account the pipe length increment. If you set that too lose you will end up with gaps to compensate between pipe length (min+increments) and distance between nodes (fittings) which might not be divisible by the pipe lengths and it's increments.

 

 

Adrian S.
blog.ads-sol.com 

AIP2012-2020 i7 6700k AMD R9 370
Did you find this reply helpful ?
If so please use the Accepted Solutions or Like button - Thank you!
Message 3 of 5
cbenner
in reply to: salariua

Adrian is dead on when he mentions pipe length minimums.  I always set mine as small as Inventor will let me (.001") this allows for tighter engagements on those fittings where I actually care about that.  (mostly I set them to zero so my pipes are buried in the fitting socket).  This also allows for certain types of fittings such as olets, to be set in a route 180 degrees apart with only .001" between them.... essentially in the same location for detailing purposes.  We do this a lot for locating electrodes in a pipe, top & bottom.  T&P won't allow them to be on the same node, but if your minimum pipe length is .001, you can locate two nodes that far apart.  So close it doesn't show up on a drawing.

Message 4 of 5
salariua
in reply to: cbenner

Gee thanks,

 

Of course I am right, I learned from the best, Chris Benner, aka: The Tube&Pipe Guru.

 

 

Adrian S.
blog.ads-sol.com 

AIP2012-2020 i7 6700k AMD R9 370
Did you find this reply helpful ?
If so please use the Accepted Solutions or Like button - Thank you!
Message 5 of 5
awatt
in reply to: salariua

Thanks.  Good stuff to know about the pipes.  At the moment though I'm looking more closely at my fitting-to-fitting engagements.  Has anyone worked with JIC fittings?

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.

Post to forums  

Autodesk Design & Make Report