Community
Inventor Forum
Welcome to Autodesk’s Inventor Forums. Share your knowledge, ask questions, and explore popular Inventor topics.
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Topics adressed in SP1?

8 REPLIES 8
Reply
Message 1 of 9
Anonymous
391 Views, 8 Replies

Topics adressed in SP1?

Anyone know which topics being adressed in SP1?
Is there a list of some kind on the net?

I am eager to know if the problems we have in our company regarding INV6
will be solved... Soon.



Claus
8 REPLIES 8
Message 2 of 9
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

See thread "Autodesk Responds to R6" for a list of some

--
Sean Dotson, PE
http://www.sdotson.com
...sleep is for the weak..
-----------------------------------------
"Claus Frølund" wrote in message
news:BB5196E3A88B20636F347BE31E8F2DD3@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> Anyone know which topics being adressed in SP1?
> Is there a list of some kind on the net?
>
> I am eager to know if the problems we have in our company regarding INV6
> will be solved... Soon.
>
>
>
> Claus
>
>
Message 3 of 9
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

No way they could publish a list before the fact. Consider the nature of
programming: making changes to one feature affects other features and some
features that may have been planned for release might not make the cut. Can
you imagine the indignatious uproar if they published a list with an issue
that couldn't be included? By reading this group, you will find it common
that having experience in developing software isn't a requirement for
knowing how it should be done.
~Larry

"Claus Frølund" wrote in message
news:BB5196E3A88B20636F347BE31E8F2DD3@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> Anyone know which topics being adressed in SP1?
> Is there a list of some kind on the net?
>
> I am eager to know if the problems we have in our company regarding INV6
> will be solved... Soon.
>
>
>
> Claus
>
>
Message 4 of 9
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

Actually it was posted here somewhere that the SP was done but was in final
testing. I bet they already have the .txt file for it. It would be great to
see that!

"Larry Caldwell" wrote in message
news:B76172D2A6898327651D4C68861FE104@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> No way they could publish a list before the fact. Consider the nature of
> programming: making changes to one feature affects other features and some
> features that may have been planned for release might not make the cut.
Can
> you imagine the indignatious uproar if they published a list with an issue
> that couldn't be included? By reading this group, you will find it common
> that having experience in developing software isn't a requirement for
> knowing how it should be done.
> ~Larry
>
> "Claus Frølund" wrote in message
> news:BB5196E3A88B20636F347BE31E8F2DD3@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> > Anyone know which topics being adressed in SP1?
> > Is there a list of some kind on the net?
> >
> > I am eager to know if the problems we have in our company regarding INV6
> > will be solved... Soon.
> >
> >
> >
> > Claus
> >
> >
>
>
Message 5 of 9
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

I'd like to have a look at that too but, sadly, don't have an in.
~Larry

"Eric Zirkle" <@> wrote in message
news:7AF3013090E3776F4717FC68F98B8255@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> Actually it was posted here somewhere that the SP was done but was in
final
> testing. I bet they already have the .txt file for it. It would be great
to
> see that!
>
> "Larry Caldwell" wrote in message
> news:B76172D2A6898327651D4C68861FE104@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> > No way they could publish a list before the fact. Consider the nature of
> > programming: making changes to one feature affects other features and
some
> > features that may have been planned for release might not make the cut.
> Can
> > you imagine the indignatious uproar if they published a list with an
issue
> > that couldn't be included? By reading this group, you will find it
common
> > that having experience in developing software isn't a requirement for
> > knowing how it should be done.
> > ~Larry
> >
> > "Claus Frølund" wrote in message
> > news:BB5196E3A88B20636F347BE31E8F2DD3@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> > > Anyone know which topics being adressed in SP1?
> > > Is there a list of some kind on the net?
> > >
> > > I am eager to know if the problems we have in our company regarding
INV6
> > > will be solved... Soon.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Claus
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
Message 6 of 9
Jeff_Hoffman
in reply to: Anonymous

Sean,

Were can I find this list for the SP1.

Thanks,

Jeff Hoffman
Message 7 of 9
gnrnr
in reply to: Anonymous

Where is that Sean? I just did a search of the groups, but couldn't find the topic you mentioned.

Regards



Steve
Message 8 of 9
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

I found it:

Snip------------------
I have been reading messages from some disgruntled R6 users (most notably,
the "Silence" thread) about Autodesk not owning up to issues with R6. Read
below the email I received today from Robert "Buzz" Kross from Autodesk.



All,

I have heard a number of issues from your customers concerning Inventor 6
quality. Most of these issues have focused on drawing manager. My team has
met with a key members of our technical sales team and with customers to
define the scope of the problem. In response to this we are producing an
Inventor 6 service pack. The service pack will be available for download on
November 15. Code development work for the service pack is largely completed
and it is currently under final test and being qualified for release. Over
600 customer issues spanning the entire product have been resolved. I will
forward a separate detail list of fixes to MCAD TECH FAM later this week.
Following is a high level summary:


Parts

Around 90 issues have been resolved that deal specifically with parts, most
of the issues are priority 2 and 3. Memory leaks which lead to capacity
issues have been fixed. Issues with features failing to update which are
dependent on loft, thicken and delete face operations have been fixed. Some
key Autodesk Shape Manager fixes have also been incorporated including fixes
for specific fillet and loft crashes. A bug that limited emboss
functionality has been removed.


Assemblies

In assemblies we have resolved around 80 issues, most having to do with
constraints. This includes several issues with transitional constraints and
adaptive assemblies. Limitations with constraining adaptive assemblies to
non-adaptive assemblies have been fixed. Certain iMate fixes have been
introduced. In addition, a large set of special weldment cases has been
resolved. Specifically, weld symbols jumping, failing fillet welds, issues
with creating welds have been fixed.


Drawings

Over 200 fixes for the service pack have been in drawings. Issues related to
specific migration problems, holes and hole tables, and performance and
capacity for view creation of very large assemblies have been fixed. Over 30
crashes have been fixed. Some specific issues that have been resolved
include:

- Crash getting all dimensions from a derived part with a pattern.

- Crash after save when copy/paste a sheet with projected view.

- Crash when cursor crosses the section arrow during section view
creation.

- Crash annotating to some legacy section views.

- Annotations do not stay attached to view geometry on assembly update.

- Weld annotations not recovered in a specific drawing view.

- Assembly demote causes part list numbering to jump.

- Drawing cannot be opened after deleting a component from .ipn's
assembly.

- Breakout view causes crosshatch to be wrong.


Other

A relatively small number of issues have been fixed in Data Exchange,
Content Library, API, Sheet Metal and Surfacing.




Best Regards,

-buzz

Snip--------------
Message 9 of 9
gnrnr
in reply to: Anonymous

Thanks for posting that Peer. I just couldn't find it.

Regards


Steve

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.

Post to forums  

Autodesk Design & Make Report