The attached 2013 file has the shape i want.To get the Lofts to work i used a Centreline option.The sketch 7 + 8 + 9 do not touch sketch 1 but it does give the shape i require.....this is only a trial attempt so i am not concerned with errors....are the Lofts created incorrectly for this shape...is it possible to actually have all the sketches from 2 to 9 touch sketch 1 and still give the same shape.....i am asking because i am not sure that the Lofts are created correctly But it does give the shape i wanted......could you get the same result as the shape attached but with better control of the sketches....example all sketches pinned to the sketch 1 profile instead of the 7 +8 +9 to touching sketch 1........is the Centreline the correct option....i could not get it work with the other options in the Lofts ?
Thanks for any help
James
2013
Niels van der Veer
Inventor professional user & 3DS Max enthusiast
Vault professional user/manager
The Netherlands
Yes thanks.....decided to start new thread as other was getting long
Back on to this part again....if i get this section correct the rest should be right to finish
Thanks
James
HI!
I don't understand your issue... if it's the shape you need, just repair the errors/warnings.
Remove the 3D sketch and change it by 2D sketch and thats it.
Tips:
Why the sketch 3D for the rails?! It's better to use sketch 2D... easier to control.
For the second rail i use a 2D sketch with external rails, tangent to the previous loft.
Have you tried to use just one loft to create all?
I prefer to use external rails, but if you achieve the shape with the center rail, great.
Did you find this reply helpful ? If so, use the Accept as Solution or Kudos - Thank you!
thank you
i was not sure if all the sketches were suppose to touch Sketch1 for centreline Loft
I have tried to have the shape with 1 loft but i was unsuccessful.....do you know if 1 loft will work?
would you use 2 external rails for all the sketches?
Would you have the file you used to fix my attempt....i can open with Inventor 2014
Thanks again
James