The Bug to dimension representation in drawing.(AI 2009)

[mikazakov]

The radial dimension represent is not correct.
For more information see attachment.

[Anonymous]

Did you remove IV2008 after installing IV2009? If so a couple of Fonts that
are required have been deleted.

--
Dell Precision 690
Dual Quad Core E5320 @ 1.86GHz
4Gb DDR SDRam - 667 Mhz, ECC
SAS 146Gb - 15k rpm
Quadro FX3500 256Mb - Driver: 169.61 Bios: 5.71.22.55.08
XP Pro Sp2 - AIP 2008sp2 - D3D
Space Explorer USB 3.6.4
wrote in message news:5930768@discussion.autodesk.com...
The radial dimension represent is not correct.
For more information see attachment.

[mikazakov]

I removed IV2008 before installation of IV2009.
This bug permanent for various computers with IV2009.

[Anonymous]

Hi,

For radial dimension you have to change radial settings(please see attached screen shot) not diameter as you described on your picture.

Thanks,
Stefan

[mikazakov]

Stefan,
Sorry, I missed mark 🙂
Now, I attached correct screen shot, when I finded the bug.

[Anonymous]

Hi Kazan,

I can't reproduce the issue on my machine. I tried to open AI2008 idw in AI2009 and change radial setting and for me it works fine. Also new created radial dim with desired settings in AI2009 displayed correctly according to its settings. Are you sure you change settings for the right style? Is it not possible for you to change radial dim setting on a specific idw or on all idw's (new, legacy)?
Can you please share your idw with the issue so I can take a look at it?

Thanks,
Stefan

[mikazakov]

I do not migrated old idw-files to AI2009.
I working to "default" template for GOST-standart of AI2009.
I sure, that I checked right style.
I attached the sample of idw with problem of radial dimension.

[Anonymous]

Hi Kazak,

I found out that the issue occurs only when the radial dimension is inside of an arc, outside dimensions behaves well. It is related to radial dimensions with these text orientation: First Above Landing Line, All Above Landing Underlined and JIS Alignment/Format.
I logged #1080383 for the issue.

Thanks,
Stefan

[mikazakov]

Thank you Stefan, for your consideration 🙂