Community
Inventor Forum
Welcome to Autodesk’s Inventor Forums. Share your knowledge, ask questions, and explore popular Inventor topics.
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Section view limitation

17 REPLIES 17
Reply
Message 1 of 18
Anonymous
693 Views, 17 Replies

Section view limitation

Section view has a pretty lame limitation. Please see attached pdf. The
section view is wrong, at least according to samples I found in my drafting
book (Engineering Drawing and Design by David Madsen). It can lead to
manufacturing mistakes. Maybe there is something I don't understand. Please
explain to me why Inventor is dealing with section the way it does. Drawing
was done in AIS2010.


--
Greg Oprzadek
Project Engineer
O.B. Williams Co.
www.obwilliams.com
17 REPLIES 17
Message 2 of 18
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

The section is correct. You need to make your section view through the
whole part if you do not want it clipped off the sides. Drag the line out
wider so it encompasses your whole part width.

"greg oprzadek" <<> wrote in message news:6204425@discussion.autodesk.com...
Section view has a pretty lame limitation. Please see attached pdf. The
section view is wrong, at least according to samples I found in my drafting
book (Engineering Drawing and Design by David Madsen). It can lead to
manufacturing mistakes. Maybe there is something I don't understand. Please
explain to me why Inventor is dealing with section the way it does. Drawing
was done in AIS2010.


--
Greg Oprzadek
Project Engineer
O.B. Williams Co.
www.obwilliams.com
Message 3 of 18
Josh_Petitt
in reply to: Anonymous

I agree w/ you 100%. I have also wished the cut edges would show as cut edges, not at normal edges. It can be confusing.
Message 4 of 18
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

but what if the OP wanted to only show a portion of the Section view as
shown in their pdf?

Those edges should be depicted different that how Inventor does it.
Message 5 of 18
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

Thanks, but that is the whole point. I did not go outside the part. The
program should let me know that. What if you miss it by very small amount?
By placing visible edges where they don't belong it shows wrong information.


--
Greg Oprzadek
Project Engineer
O.B. Williams Co.
www.obwilliams.com


wrote in message news:6204428@discussion.autodesk.com...
The section is correct. You need to make your section view through the
whole part if you do not want it clipped off the sides. Drag the line out
wider so it encompasses your whole part width.

"greg oprzadek" <<> wrote in message news:6204425@discussion.autodesk.com...
Section view has a pretty lame limitation. Please see attached pdf. The
section view is wrong, at least according to samples I found in my drafting
book (Engineering Drawing and Design by David Madsen). It can lead to
manufacturing mistakes. Maybe there is something I don't understand. Please
explain to me why Inventor is dealing with section the way it does. Drawing
was done in AIS2010.


--
Greg Oprzadek
Project Engineer
O.B. Williams Co.
www.obwilliams.com
Message 6 of 18
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous


This could easily be solved with a simple
checkbox inside of the "Edit Section Properties" dialog - see
attached...






brian r.
iwaskewycz


style="FONT-SIZE: 14pt; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">inventor
specialist


style="FONT-SIZE: 14pt; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">
href="http://www.corefurnace.com/">core furnace systems

Message 7 of 18
Josh_Petitt
in reply to: Anonymous


Greg, here's a tip for the centerline errors you showed in your sample. What I now do, if the part is revolved about an origin axis, is to (in the drawing browser), expand the node for the view, then expand the node for the model in the view. You should be able to then RMB on the origin axes and "Include" them.

Message 8 of 18
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous


Nice tip. Thanks Josh.

 


<Josh_Petitt> wrote in
message news:6204443@discussion.autodesk.com...

Greg, here's a tip for
the centerline errors you showed in your sample. What I now do, if the part is
revolved about an origin axis, is to (in the drawing browser), expand the node
for the view, then expand the node for the model in the view. You should be able
to then RMB on the origin axes and "Include" them.
Message 9 of 18
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous


Brian, I hope you are involved in
development of the next release. This is a great idea. Although, additional box
could be placed on Drawing tab under Application Options to make it default for
all sections.

 


--
Greg Oprzadek
Project
Engineer
O.B. Williams Co.

href="http://www.obwilliams.com">www.obwilliams.com



style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"
dir=ltr>


This could easily be solved with a simple
checkbox inside of the "Edit Section Properties" dialog - see
attached...






brian
r. iwaskewycz


style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana; FONT-SIZE: 14pt">inventor
specialist


style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana; FONT-SIZE: 14pt">

style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana; FONT-SIZE: 14pt">
href="http://www.corefurnace.com/">core furnace systems

Message 10 of 18
Josh_Petitt
in reply to: Anonymous

I wasn't quite sure about how the check box would work? The section view currently does crop to the section edges, but the cut edges are not the "correct" linetype. Are you suggesting that the checkbox (if left unchecked) would not crop the view?
Message 11 of 18
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous


Exactly.






brian r.
iwaskewycz


style="FONT-SIZE: 14pt; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">inventor
specialist

Message 12 of 18
Josh_Petitt
in reply to: Anonymous


ah, that would be another good addition. But what if you wanted the cut lines (i.e. wanted the section to crop the view)? There are times I use the section view specifically to "cut" out only part of a view.

Message 13 of 18
c.henry
in reply to: Anonymous

excuse me for being dumb,
why would you want to section that or any part that way, what would you hope to detail by having the "head" in that view with cut edges ?

should that section not be either a full view or just a zero depth slice ?

what happens if you adjust the depth of the section to terminate inside the "head" ?


i understand the lines messing up the machinists out on the floor, but if you use eithe rof the other methods that is not an issue is it ?


/curious
Message 14 of 18
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous


Brian, besides the button giving the
option of cropping or not, I would like the lines to be of different type and on
different layer than visible edges. It is undesired to show hard
edges where they don't exist. I believe ANSI standard shows phantom line
where this happens.

 

I have to say that SW has
advantage here. At least, it warns you at time of creating the section, that it
is going to be partial, and gives you option of cropping or not.

 


--
Greg Oprzadek
Project
Engineer
O.B. Williams Co.

href="http://www.obwilliams.com">www.obwilliams.com



style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"
dir=ltr>


Exactly.






brian
r. iwaskewycz


style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana; FONT-SIZE: 14pt">inventor
specialist


style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana; FONT-SIZE: 14pt">

style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana; FONT-SIZE: 14pt">
title="http://www.corefurnace.com/ CTRL + Click to follow link"
href="http://www.corefurnace.c...

Message 15 of 18
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous


This is a very simple part. In this
instance you are right. However, I am sure there are situation where you have to
show full depth section and then it does not work correctly.


style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
excuse
me for being dumb, why would you want to section that or any part that way,
what would you hope to detail by having the "head" in that view with cut edges
? should that section not be either a full view or just a zero depth slice ?
what happens if you adjust the depth of the section to terminate inside the
"head" ? i understand the lines messing up the machinists out on the floor,
but if you use eithe rof the other methods that is not an issue is it ?
/curious
Message 16 of 18
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous


Nothing's stopping you from changing the linetype
or visibility of those cutting lines.  I do agree, however, that they
probably should default to a different layer than visible edges.






brian r.
iwaskewycz


style="FONT-SIZE: 14pt; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">inventor
specialist


style="FONT-SIZE: 14pt; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">core furnace
systems
Message 17 of 18
zma1013
in reply to: Anonymous

I also think that the cut edges should look like break lines or phantom lines. I actually have a few parts where there is just supposed to be a partial section and then I have to actually make a sketch on the new section view and create my own break lines with the sketch. It works, but it is certainly not ideal.
IV2012

Windows XP SP3 32-bit
Intel Core 2 Duo 6400 @ 2.13 GHz
Nvidia Quadro FX 3450/4000 SDI 256MB Vram
2 GB Ram
160GB HDD
Message 18 of 18
pcunningham1
in reply to: Anonymous

I would think the button should mimic that of the (IV2008) detail view 'cutout shape' button, and it should default to jagged lines, since no drafting standard in the world allows the broken edges of partial views/sections to be depicted as straight object edges.



Paul Cunningham
Paul Cunningham
IV2008

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.

Post to forums  

Autodesk Design & Make Report