Repeatable Crash SP1

[Anonymous]

I have been experiencing a repeatable crash using IV6 SP1. With an assembly
open that contains a component pattern I attempt to open the base or first
element of the pattern and then save a copy of that element to a different
name. It does manage to actually save a copy but before it ever seems to
finish and release control from the save it brings Inventor completely down.
Anyone seen this? Personally, I don't see SP1 much more stable then without
the service pack. I guess you can say its more stable if you used to have 4
or 5 crashes a day compared to 2 or 3 a day now with SP1. I though 5.3 was
rock solid. I hope we can see something that stable with the next service
pack (please tell me there'll be another one).

[Anonymous]

I find IV6 sp1 alot more stable than IV5.3 sp2 was.

Just saying it may not be the software.

--
Cory McConnell
BJ pipeline Inspection
"Pat Soliday" wrote in message
news:6DE4D45FA50E281E26CC4110ECB82999@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> I have been experiencing a repeatable crash using IV6 SP1. With an
assembly
> open that contains a component pattern I attempt to open the base or first
> element of the pattern and then save a copy of that element to a different
> name. It does manage to actually save a copy but before it ever seems to
> finish and release control from the save it brings Inventor completely
down.
> Anyone seen this? Personally, I don't see SP1 much more stable then
without
> the service pack. I guess you can say its more stable if you used to have
4
> or 5 crashes a day compared to 2 or 3 a day now with SP1. I though 5.3 was
> rock solid. I hope we can see something that stable with the next service
> pack (please tell me there'll be another one).
>
>

[Anonymous]

...i disagree. my inv6 sp1 is far more unstable than inv5.3 sp2 ever was.

[Anonymous]

proving my point...

--
Cory McConnell
BJ pipeline Inspection
"Mark A. Bystry" wrote in message
news:f127aa4.1@WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> ...i disagree. my inv6 sp1 is far more unstable than inv5.3 sp2 ever was.
>
>

[gnrnr]

We have 1 machine with 5.3SP2 and 1 machine with 5.3SP0 with no noticable difference in stability.