Rebuild All Errors

[Anonymous]

When I do a "rebuild all" to a large complex .ipt I get a long list of
errors to a perfectly fine file. Smaller, less complicated files are fine.
Anyone else notice this?

[Anonymous]

What are your errors exactly? Larger more complex parts do offer more
opportunities for errors, but I have never had a larger part/assembly file
get errors just because it is large.



"MikeC" wrote in message
news:6090D83F2754637E147EE4189508F257@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> When I do a "rebuild all" to a large complex .ipt I get a long list of
> errors to a perfectly fine file. Smaller, less complicated files are fine.
> Anyone else notice this?
>
>

[Anonymous]

I'm leaving for the day, but I'll try and list a few for you tomorrow. I
posted this to see if anyone else noticed this or am I alone. If i'm alone I
have modeling issues.

"AUGUST PANNING" wrote in message
news:961A377827528C34EDE06CE2A1188E3B@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> What are your errors exactly? Larger more complex parts do offer more
> opportunities for errors, but I have never had a larger part/assembly file
> get errors just because it is large.
>
>
>
> "MikeC" wrote in message
> news:6090D83F2754637E147EE4189508F257@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> > When I do a "rebuild all" to a large complex .ipt I get a long list of
> > errors to a perfectly fine file. Smaller, less complicated files are
fine.
> > Anyone else notice this?
> >
> >
>
>

[Anonymous]

This is the reason you should run "rebuild all" frequently while building a
part. Most build features don't force a rebuild. I think this is to
improve the speed of the program. Often, there will be an error with a
feature that doesn't show up until you do a rebuild all. Something that
worked, but by all logic shouldn't have. If other features downstream
utilize that feature, they will also fail with a rebuild all. The first
thing to do is move the EOP to below the highest error. Try fixing the
feature without changing or destroying the geometry, then slowly step down
the EOP. This may automatically fix may downstream errors.

I have also had a few cases, especially in complex parts, where an upstream
feature suddenly became corrupted, causing a domino failure.

Pat

"MikeC" wrote in message
news:6090D83F2754637E147EE4189508F257@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> When I do a "rebuild all" to a large complex .ipt I get a long list of
> errors to a perfectly fine file. Smaller, less complicated files are fine.
> Anyone else notice this?
>
>

[Anonymous]

Thanks for the reply and advice. I'll be sure to "rebuild all" as I go along
in the future. I think Autodesk should make mention of this quirk somewhere.


"Patrick Berry" wrote in message
news:C344ED99A5166488C09CC16D0D82059B@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> This is the reason you should run "rebuild all" frequently while building
a
> part. Most build features don't force a rebuild. I think this is to
> improve the speed of the program. Often, there will be an error with a
> feature that doesn't show up until you do a rebuild all. Something that
> worked, but by all logic shouldn't have. If other features downstream
> utilize that feature, they will also fail with a rebuild all. The first
> thing to do is move the EOP to below the highest error. Try fixing the
> feature without changing or destroying the geometry, then slowly step down
> the EOP. This may automatically fix may downstream errors.
>
> I have also had a few cases, especially in complex parts, where an
upstream
> feature suddenly became corrupted, causing a domino failure.
>
> Pat
>
> "MikeC" wrote in message
> news:6090D83F2754637E147EE4189508F257@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> > When I do a "rebuild all" to a large complex .ipt I get a long list of
> > errors to a perfectly fine file. Smaller, less complicated files are
fine.
> > Anyone else notice this?
> >
> >
>
>

[Anonymous]

See CF "rebuild errors". Do a rebuild for a list of errors. By the way,
everytime you do a rebuild, a different list of errors come up.

"AUGUST PANNING" wrote in message
news:961A377827528C34EDE06CE2A1188E3B@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> What are your errors exactly? Larger more complex parts do offer more
> opportunities for errors, but I have never had a larger part/assembly file
> get errors just because it is large.
>
>
>
> "MikeC" wrote in message
> news:6090D83F2754637E147EE4189508F257@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> > When I do a "rebuild all" to a large complex .ipt I get a long list of
> > errors to a perfectly fine file. Smaller, less complicated files are
fine.
> > Anyone else notice this?
> >
> >
>
>

[Anonymous]

Mike -

There are two files from you in Inventor Customer Files. They
appear to be duplicate with same byte count but slightly
different post names? If this is so, please respond and I will
remove the second one since they are large. See below.

Thanks -
--
Anne Brown
Manager, Moderator
Autodesk Product Support Discussion Groups
Discussion Q&A: http://www.autodesk.com/discussion

First file:

Rebuild Errors
Date:
Wed, 24 Sep 2003 05:08:47 -0700
From:
"MikeC"
Newsgroups:
autodesk.inventor.customer-files

Second File:

rebuild errors
Date:
Wed, 24 Sep 2003 05:16:40 -0700
From:
"MikeC"
Newsgroups:
autodesk.inventor.customer-files



MikeC wrote:
>
> See CF "rebuild errors".

[Anonymous]

Sorry Anne, don't know what happened to the first attempt. Delete the
smaller of the two. Thanks

"Anne Brown" wrote in message
news:3F719C72.DC68412B@autodesk.com...
> Mike -
>
> There are two files from you in Inventor Customer Files. They
> appear to be duplicate with same byte count but slightly
> different post names? If this is so, please respond and I will
> remove the second one since they are large. See below.
>
> Thanks -
> --
> Anne Brown
> Manager, Moderator
> Autodesk Product Support Discussion Groups
> Discussion Q&A: http://www.autodesk.com/discussion
>
> First file:
>
> Rebuild Errors
> Date:
> Wed, 24 Sep 2003 05:08:47 -0700
> From:
> "MikeC"
> Newsgroups:
> autodesk.inventor.customer-files
>
> Second File:
>
> rebuild errors
> Date:
> Wed, 24 Sep 2003 05:16:40 -0700
> From:
> "MikeC"
> Newsgroups:
> autodesk.inventor.customer-files
>
>
>
> MikeC wrote:
> >
> > See CF "rebuild errors".

[Anonymous]

Mike,

I logged a defect against this (Internal tracking # 523642).

Glenn Chun
Autodesk Inventor Development


"MikeC" wrote in message
news:09FCE6FBBAB8694C15EF389F5B4664CB@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> See CF "rebuild errors". Do a rebuild for a list of errors. By the way,
> everytime you do a rebuild, a different list of errors come up.

[Anonymous]

Thanks Glenn, It's nice to know you guys are listening.

"Glenn Chun (Autodesk)" wrote in message
news:7DAF4DABA1FC7FBCECE603F9B7FBEA3B@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> Mike,
>
> I logged a defect against this (Internal tracking # 523642).
>
> Glenn Chun
> Autodesk Inventor Development
>
>
> "MikeC" wrote in message
> news:09FCE6FBBAB8694C15EF389F5B4664CB@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> > See CF "rebuild errors". Do a rebuild for a list of errors. By the way,
> > everytime you do a rebuild, a different list of errors come up.
>
>

[Anonymous]

I don't know, if that helps:
I was able to move the EOP marker fully up, and then down, step by step.
Only one problem with Fillet78
But when I tried to do a Rebuild All after that, there were a lot of errors,
first problem with Loft5. My system: IV6 SP2

Walter

"Patrick Berry" schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:C344ED99A5166488C09CC16D0D82059B@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> This is the reason you should run "rebuild all" frequently while building
a
> part. Most build features don't force a rebuild. I think this is to
> improve the speed of the program. Often, there will be an error with a
> feature that doesn't show up until you do a rebuild all. Something that
> worked, but by all logic shouldn't have. If other features downstream
> utilize that feature, they will also fail with a rebuild all. The first
> thing to do is move the EOP to below the highest error. Try fixing the
> feature without changing or destroying the geometry, then slowly step down
> the EOP. This may automatically fix may downstream errors.
>
> I have also had a few cases, especially in complex parts, where an
upstream
> feature suddenly became corrupted, causing a domino failure.
>
> Pat
>
> "MikeC" wrote in message
> news:6090D83F2754637E147EE4189508F257@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> > When I do a "rebuild all" to a large complex .ipt I get a long list of
> > errors to a perfectly fine file. Smaller, less complicated files are
fine.
> > Anyone else notice this?
> >
> >
>
>

[Anonymous]

I've noticed that moving the EOP is no substitute for "rebuild all". Hidden
errors pile up in the model over time if you don't run rebuild all
regularly. This is especially true if you are doing a lot of edits to the
part and have moved the EOP up in the tree to make them.

Pat

"W. Holzwarth" wrote in message
news:00D280BC8F46547DD8316A24F50B2FED@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> I don't know, if that helps:
> I was able to move the EOP marker fully up, and then down, step by step.
> Only one problem with Fillet78
> But when I tried to do a Rebuild All after that, there were a lot of
errors,
> first problem with Loft5. My system: IV6 SP2
>
> Walter
>
> "Patrick Berry" schrieb im Newsbeitrag
> news:C344ED99A5166488C09CC16D0D82059B@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> > This is the reason you should run "rebuild all" frequently while
building
> a
> > part. Most build features don't force a rebuild. I think this is to
> > improve the speed of the program. Often, there will be an error with a
> > feature that doesn't show up until you do a rebuild all. Something that
> > worked, but by all logic shouldn't have. If other features downstream
> > utilize that feature, they will also fail with a rebuild all. The first
> > thing to do is move the EOP to below the highest error. Try fixing the
> > feature without changing or destroying the geometry, then slowly step
down
> > the EOP. This may automatically fix may downstream errors.
> >
> > I have also had a few cases, especially in complex parts, where an
> upstream
> > feature suddenly became corrupted, causing a domino failure.
> >
> > Pat
> >
> > "MikeC" wrote in message
> > news:6090D83F2754637E147EE4189508F257@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> > > When I do a "rebuild all" to a large complex .ipt I get a long list of
> > > errors to a perfectly fine file. Smaller, less complicated files are
> fine.
> > > Anyone else notice this?
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>