Community
Inventor Forum
Welcome to Autodesk’s Inventor Forums. Share your knowledge, ask questions, and explore popular Inventor topics.
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

New surface problem

16 REPLIES 16
Reply
Message 1 of 17
Anonymous
645 Views, 16 Replies

New surface problem

I have posted in CF a typical surface that we get from a customer. It's a
surface that I converted directly from CATIA through a translation utility. The
utility has surface repair tools, and I ran this part on the most intensive
repair mode. I am not concerned with the actual thickness of the part but I need
to be able to show this in an .idw. If anyone can find any way of doing this,
and show me how, I would be very grateful. Thanks.

--
Dave Jacquemotte
Automation Designer
16 REPLIES 16
Message 2 of 17
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

Looking at the file now but from now on please zip up large files. This was
a 6MB+ file!!!

--
Sean Dotson, PE
http://www.sdotson.com
Check the Inventor FAQ for most common questions
www.sdotson.com/faq.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------
"Dave J" wrote in message
news:B3A4AE6F8962D14B143CC316447615F7@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> I have posted in CF a typical surface that we get from a customer. It's a
> surface that I converted directly from CATIA through a translation
utility. The
> utility has surface repair tools, and I ran this part on the most
intensive
> repair mode. I am not concerned with the actual thickness of the part but
I need
> to be able to show this in an .idw. If anyone can find any way of doing
this,
> and show me how, I would be very grateful. Thanks.
>
> --
> Dave Jacquemotte
> Automation Designer
>
>
>
>
Message 3 of 17
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

Any way you can get your customer to send you a solid STEP file instead of surface data?

MechMan
Message 4 of 17
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

Dave,

Can you smash out to Autocad and then insert into idw.?
Not sure if this will work for you.
Message 5 of 17
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

Yes, I'm sorry about file size. I usually zip them, but was in a hurry and
forgot.

--
Dave Jacquemotte
Automation Designer
Message 6 of 17
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

This needs to be addressed along with showing a part that is nothing but a
sketch in an IDW. I can't seem to get this to work. Possibly you could
thicken it in MDT easier but I'm having a heck of a time getting it to
thicken.

--
Sean Dotson, PE
http://www.sdotson.com
Check the Inventor FAQ for most common questions
www.sdotson.com/faq.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------
"Dave J" wrote in message
news:D16F433EE31AE211D5FC496452C943B0@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> Yes, I'm sorry about file size. I usually zip them, but was in a hurry and
> forgot.
>
> --
> Dave Jacquemotte
> Automation Designer
>
>
>
>
Message 7 of 17
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

No, I can not. Even if I did, they would be exporting it from CATIA, so I don't
see how it would help. This is an native as I can get it.

--
Dave Jacquemotte
Automation Designer
Message 8 of 17
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

Dave,
Please post the *.igs file to CF so I can examine the surfaces with the MDT module of Inventor Series.
And BTW CATIA will do solids, from what I can see in your Inventor file this is a surface with no thickness. If it had been converted into IGES from a CATIA solid there would be sides and top and bottom.
J.D.
Message 9 of 17
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

...sigh....
I need to clarify a bit...this was a CATIA assembly machine, and this surface
was a part in the assembly as a surface. It never was a CATIA solid. There is no
.igs file, since it was imbedded in the CATIA file. I don't know if our customer
received the file or designed the part themselves, but this is what I have to
work with. What I can do is export the file from CATIA to an .igs, .stp or .sat.

--
Dave Jacquemotte
Automation Designer
Message 10 of 17
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

dave, post the file that you imported into IV if you can.

i cant seem to get an iges out of this from IV

thanks


Matt
Message 11 of 17
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

.igs, .stp or .sat?

--
Dave Jacquemotte
Automation Designer
Message 12 of 17
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

>It never was a CATIA solid.


...sigh...
Isn't that what I just said?

>There is no .igs file

Then Dave, how did you get it into Inventor?
You must have opened an IGIS file, No?

J.D.
Message 13 of 17
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

upload the iges.

Matt
Message 14 of 17
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

No. I used a conversion utility to import a CATIA file and export directly to
SAT. I don't know what format the original surface was. I can assume it was
iges, but it's just an assumption. Anyway, I am posting the .iges export from
TransMagic (that's my utility.) under Surface problem. (I'm hoping people stay
away from my other post...I messed that one up. Forgot to zip.

--
Dave Jacquemotte
Automation Designer
Message 15 of 17
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

Use the amthicken command in MDT module of Inventor Series.
Then amcombine the solids. Open in Inventor to finish conversion. I had no trouble converting the surfaces to solids. All-in-all these are great surfaces compared to most I see. The problem should be entirely repairable. If you can't figure it out in MDT module let me know. I suspect someone will finish out the problem as a challenge and post by morning.
J.D.
Message 16 of 17
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

See CF. Of course this part would not have constant thickness if stamped from sheetmetal.
J.D.
Message 17 of 17
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

Thanks, JD

--
Dave Jacquemotte
Automation Designer

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.

Post to forums  

Autodesk Design & Make Report