Inventor General Discussion

Inventor General Discussion

Reply
Contributor
samstreet101
Posts: 25
Registered: ‎09-26-2012
Message 1 of 3 (1,038 Views)
Accepted Solution

Material Properties - Shear Modulus discrepency

1038 Views, 2 Replies
09-26-2012 06:50 AM

Whilst trying to replicate an example of a mild steel bar in torsion I came across a discrepency in the default value for the shear modulus/modulus of rigidity for Mild Steel in Inventor's material library.

 

It lists the shear modulus as 140250MPa or 140.25GPa, however, after looking at various sources including matweb and steel stockists, almost all of them settle on a shear modulus of around 77-80GPa for Mild Steel. I was looking at grade 1018 Cold Rolled which is I believe the most common grade.

 

I was wondering where exactly Autodesk gets its data for material properties and how it accounts for this discrepency (if indeed it is one)

Hi Sam,

 

  Thank you for bringing this to our attention.  It is a known issue entered in our database as 1466253.

 

  You are correct that if we calcuate if via G = E / 2(1+Nu) we get 85.94 GPa, where E is Young's Modulus (220 GPa) and Nu = Poisson's ratio (0.28).

 

  If you are concerned about simulation results using the Shear Modulus value, we don't use it directly.  We use the E and Nu values.  Also, in the Stress Analysis report, we use the calculated G value.

 

  We apologize for the inconvenience this may be causing.

 

Best regards, -Hugh

Employee
henderh
Posts: 650
Registered: ‎06-07-2007
Message 2 of 3 (1,029 Views)

Re: Material Properties - Shear Modulus discrepency

09-26-2012 10:01 AM in reply to: samstreet101

Hi Sam,

 

  Thank you for bringing this to our attention.  It is a known issue entered in our database as 1466253.

 

  You are correct that if we calcuate if via G = E / 2(1+Nu) we get 85.94 GPa, where E is Young's Modulus (220 GPa) and Nu = Poisson's ratio (0.28).

 

  If you are concerned about simulation results using the Shear Modulus value, we don't use it directly.  We use the E and Nu values.  Also, in the Stress Analysis report, we use the calculated G value.

 

  We apologize for the inconvenience this may be causing.

 

Best regards, -Hugh



Hugh Henderson
Simulation QA Engineer
DLS
Contributor
samstreet101
Posts: 25
Registered: ‎09-26-2012
Message 3 of 3 (1,007 Views)

Re: Material Properties - Shear Modulus discrepency

09-27-2012 01:55 AM in reply to: henderh

Thanks very much for the timely reply Hugh,

 

That clears that up nicely and puts my mind as ease. I suspected it wasn't using the 140GPa value as the simulation results tended to agree (more or less) with what I calculated it to be anyway.

 

Thanks again,

 

Sam

 

Announcements
Are you familiar with the Autodesk Expert Elites? The Expert Elite program is made up of customers that help other customers by sharing knowledge and exemplifying an engaging style of collaboration. To learn more, please visit our Expert Elite website.
Need installation help?

Start with some of our most frequented solutions or visit the Installation and Licensing Forum to get help installing your software.