Does anyone use Inventor without (some sort of) Vault?
I'm talking about a workgroup with at least 5 people or so.
We are starting to implement Inventor here and know that we need to implement some sort of Vault system, so we are gathering information on some different systems. Currently we are just saving the files 'on the network', which we know is not a good long term solution.
I just want to see if most people use some sort of Vault system.
Thanks,
Jim
Solved! Go to Solution.
Solved by slphantom. Go to Solution.
Solved by BassEngineer. Go to Solution.
As long as you can guarantee that 2 people will never need the same files open then you can continue all you want without Vault..
(2 Inventor users here without Vault.. But are moving to it soon cause our communication about what files we have open sucks)
no vault here.
We have several users, but seldom hit the same files at the same time.
We save all work to the network, but we have a very strucutured filing system which is key (no moving files around or duplicating them because we can't find them,etc)
wow - how long have you been working this way?
-not being critical, I've just been under the impression you sort of 'had to' use Vault...
Thanks
I've been 2 users and no Vault for about a year now. Like I said the only problem is when more than one user opens/edits the same file. If thats not going to happen the you really don't need/nor want Vault. Using Vault will add time to your processes. Opening/checking in/out,etc.. all takes time.
@Anonymous wrote:wow - how long have you been working this way?
-not being critical, I've just been under the impression you sort of 'had to' use Vault...
Thanks
I think it just depends on the kind of work you do. Our designs are pretty self contained. So users don't step on one another very often. It does happen, but when it does we always know who is working on what, so we just stop and sort it out. It's never been more than a 5-10 minute issue with us.
We have a very defined revision scheme and a very defined filing system, and I think that saves us a lot of headaches that others run into.
Your impression that Inventor users must use Vault might come from a reseller or AD telling you that, but for many it's not the case.
I used to work for a reseller and most of our customers were NOT using vault with their cad application...whether ACAD or INVENTOR.
Have to admit I'm surprised by the answers. But this is good info.
We have approx 30 engineers here, all using AutoCAD Mech. (noone using Vault). And we are just starting to use Inventor, but it is gaining traction quickly. I don't want to end up with the same mess we have with Autocad drawing files on the network, with Inventor. But I don't want to add an unnessary layer of complexity either (if we don't have to). My HOPE would be that Vault would not be that much of an intrusion.
Jim
@Anonymous wrote:My HOPE would be that Vault would not be that much of an intrusion.
I set up a test vault and put it though the paces to see what it helped and what it hurt. I'm sure that for many places Vault is a must have, so it's worth taking some time to figure it out for yourself before implementing it company wide, IMO.
i agree test it out first
DarrenP
Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.
If you have 30 engineers I recommend using Vault....if not make sure EVERYONE has a full grasp on how Inventor projects work. I doubt there is a company out there that doesn't have "broken" asemblies in Inventor if they are not using vault.
Are you guys using XREFs? If you have broken drawings (dis-associated XREFS) in ACAD Mech, most definitely get vault installed when moving to Inventor.
@pernicious wrote:...I doubt there is a company out there that doesn't have "broken" asemblies in Inventor if they are not using vault.
I know of one, and I'm sitting there right now!
I have a customer with 12 seats networked on 22 workstations. They have steadfastly refused to use Vault. However, I will be installing Vault on their systems next year when they move from 2011 to 2012. They are currently using the Shared project with local Desktop content. However, this would be a nightmare situation if they had slower servers.
If you are just implement IV, then here's my recommendation:
1. Make sure you structure your data files correctly see: http://teknigroup.com/AU2007 for information.
2. Implement Vault on install, and BEFORE training. This way, new users learn to use it in the beginning.
Feel free to contact me directly for more details and some free help.
Broken assemblies are not "cured" by using Vault. Proper data management and a good project file is the key.
We have never used vault at either of the two companies I have worked for that use Inventor. all our jobs have a job number so everything to do with that job is filed under there.
We have a standard library that you copy the models from to your directory.
I just did an automatic with another designer I did the top he did the bottom as sub assemblies no problems. we each use unique names for the models like I did the cylinder bores gage station so most of my models file names began with 'cyl'
You just have to have communication.
Thanks guys for the info. It sounds like Vault is the way to go for the long haul. Knowing us, if we don't use it, things will be a mess - as they are with all of the AutoCAD files.
Thanks,
Jim
"...Knowing us, if we don't use it, things will be a mess - as they are with all of the AutoCAD files."
I recommend, as stated by others, you correct the mess before implementing something like Vault. It tends to cast things into concrete, your mess may very well become a permenant problem...
I actively participate in the construction of assemblies with numbers of people by using a shared partition. We have yet to have any true problems. This method all really depends on how much you trust the people you work with, however.
I'm pretty new to Vault. We try to implement this since 3 months.
Just three people working on project, no big deal, but before the Vault we always have the bproblem with different versions of files.
When inplementing Vault for me, the main problem wasto put old projects into Vault database, so if you are just starting with
Inventor, its worth to start with Vault, especially if you have 30 people working.
Don't forget about other Vault functions like:
Managing file history,
Copy Design (IMHO very useful tool)
advanced searching
I think it's worth trying.
I agree with the previous posts that a good folder structure and processes are key to clean files with or without the Vault.
No one has mentioned that there are a few workflow processes that are easier to do in the Vault. For me, Copy Design, renaming, Automatic DWF's, and the Where-Used functions in the Vault make having it installed worth the extra steps.
Joe B
Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.