Does anyone use Inventor without (some sort of) Vault?
I'm talking about a workgroup with at least 5 people or so.
We are starting to implement Inventor here and know that we need to implement some sort of Vault system, so we are gathering information on some different systems. Currently we are just saving the files 'on the network', which we know is not a good long term solution.
I just want to see if most people use some sort of Vault system.
Solved! Go to Solution.
Solved! by BassEngineer. See the answer in context.
If you have 30 engineers I recommend using Vault....if not make sure EVERYONE has a full grasp on how Inventor projects work. I doubt there is a company out there that doesn't have "broken" asemblies in Inventor if they are not using vault.
Are you guys using XREFs? If you have broken drawings (dis-associated XREFS) in ACAD Mech, most definitely get vault installed when moving to Inventor.
Solved! by Dennis_Jeffrey. See the answer in context.
I have a customer with 12 seats networked on 22 workstations. They have steadfastly refused to use Vault. However, I will be installing Vault on their systems next year when they move from 2011 to 2012. They are currently using the Shared project with local Desktop content. However, this would be a nightmare situation if they had slower servers.
If you are just implement IV, then here's my recommendation:
1. Make sure you structure your data files correctly see: http://teknigroup.com/AU2007 for information.
2. Implement Vault on install, and BEFORE training. This way, new users learn to use it in the beginning.
Feel free to contact me directly for more details and some free help.
Solved! by slphantom. See the answer in context.
We have never used vault at either of the two companies I have worked for that use Inventor. all our jobs have a job number so everything to do with that job is filed under there.
We have a standard library that you copy the models from to your directory.
I just did an automatic with another designer I did the top he did the bottom as sub assemblies no problems. we each use unique names for the models like I did the cylinder bores gage station so most of my models file names began with 'cyl'
You just have to have communication.
As long as you can guarantee that 2 people will never need the same files open then you can continue all you want without Vault..
(2 Inventor users here without Vault.. But are moving to it soon cause our communication about what files we have open sucks)
no vault here.
We have several users, but seldom hit the same files at the same time.
We save all work to the network, but we have a very strucutured filing system which is key (no moving files around or duplicating them because we can't find them,etc)
I've been 2 users and no Vault for about a year now. Like I said the only problem is when more than one user opens/edits the same file. If thats not going to happen the you really don't need/nor want Vault. Using Vault will add time to your processes. Opening/checking in/out,etc.. all takes time.
wow - how long have you been working this way?
-not being critical, I've just been under the impression you sort of 'had to' use Vault...
I think it just depends on the kind of work you do. Our designs are pretty self contained. So users don't step on one another very often. It does happen, but when it does we always know who is working on what, so we just stop and sort it out. It's never been more than a 5-10 minute issue with us.
We have a very defined revision scheme and a very defined filing system, and I think that saves us a lot of headaches that others run into.
Your impression that Inventor users must use Vault might come from a reseller or AD telling you that, but for many it's not the case.
Have to admit I'm surprised by the answers. But this is good info.
We have approx 30 engineers here, all using AutoCAD Mech. (noone using Vault). And we are just starting to use Inventor, but it is gaining traction quickly. I don't want to end up with the same mess we have with Autocad drawing files on the network, with Inventor. But I don't want to add an unnessary layer of complexity either (if we don't have to). My HOPE would be that Vault would not be that much of an intrusion.
jshipley wrote:My HOPE would be that Vault would not be that much of an intrusion.
I set up a test vault and put it though the paces to see what it helped and what it hurt. I'm sure that for many places Vault is a must have, so it's worth taking some time to figure it out for yourself before implementing it company wide, IMO.
Access a broad range of knowledge to help get the most out of your products and services.