I think the problem stems from trying to make toolbars flexible enough for
everyone to
customize to their hearts delight. As a result, every permutation of
customization cannot be
tested. Then with just a few steps, common to you and some others, but not
to those testing
zap toolbar exile or mania - whichever you prefer.
It's either that or there are little yard gnomes outside playing with *BIG*
magnets.
Personally, I favor the yard gnome concept. Can magnets be made to be
selective and
work only on some toolbars and not others? 😉
--
Bill Bogan
"Walt Jaquith" wrote in message
news:DF5CE5F50EB9D2FE45FE37D5CF9F4AE3@in.WebX.maYIadrTaRb...
> Well, they rejected my application for X-wing pilot (I threw up on my
> instructor during the high-g maneuvers test), so unless I can sear them
with
> sarcasm, I might not be much help.
>
> Seriously, I remember the bad ol' days of MDT. Every so often my toolbar
> interface would just implode, and I'd have to reinstall MDT (shudder) to
get
> it stable again. Why are toolbars such a problem? I work with many
> software packages that have them, and none have the kind of problems that
> Autodesk products appear to have. Let's face it, if the user interface is
> uncomfortable, clumsy or flakey, it's hardly going to make much difference
> how awesome the tools are.
>
> WJ
>
>
>