Inventor General Discussion

## Inventor General Discussion

Contributor
Posts: 13
Registered: ‎10-05-2010
Message 1 of 5 (173 Views)

# Another flattening riddle

173 Views, 4 Replies
08-06-2012 09:21 AM

I am trying to model a hollow curved disk as we would build it; faces cut form 1/8" material and roll formed and a return of.0625 thickness spanning the two.  The three parts were devived from disk3.ipt.   The faces both flatten.  The return thinks it flattened but did not.  Each of the 3 parts has its sheet metal rules thicknes set to "thickness".  I have learned a bit searching for someone's simalar problem but not solved my own.  I am pretty sure that this will flatten without deformation.

Any insight would be appreciated.

Thanks,

Zak

*Expert Elite*
Posts: 2,538
Registered: ‎09-13-2011
Message 2 of 5 (170 Views)

# Re: Another flattening riddle

08-06-2012 09:27 AM in reply to: zakaronius

Inventor can't unfold that.

Mike (not Matt) Rattray

Contributor
Posts: 13
Registered: ‎10-05-2010
Message 3 of 5 (164 Views)

# Re: Another flattening riddle

08-06-2012 09:46 AM in reply to: zakaronius

Thanks for the quick response.

It seems that Inventor 2013 can not unfold this yet I find that very hard to believe.

Considering Dr Mather's comment regarding part2:

http://forums.autodesk.com/t5/Autodesk-Inventor/How-can-I-flatten-these/m-p/3465526/highlight/true#M...

..MIGHT be able to be flattenned;  clearly part2 has compound curves.  I would have thought it impossible to flatten without deformation.  My return seems to me as it would lay flat as anything.  I guess I'll try something different to prove or disprove that notion.

Thanks.

Contributor
Posts: 13
Registered: ‎10-05-2010
Message 4 of 5 (148 Views)

# Re: Another flattening riddle

08-06-2012 10:37 AM in reply to: zakaronius

Yup.  You are right, Mike.  Thanks

Contributor
Posts: 13
Registered: ‎10-05-2010
Message 5 of 5 (68 Views)

# Re: Another flattening riddle

08-08-2012 05:56 AM in reply to: zakaronius

Still trying to solve what, seems to me, ought to be a simple problem.

Attached is a new version of the return that would not flatten.  A sweep rather than a patch between two surfaces.

No deleted faces.  Sheet metal environment  Thickness matches SM rule...

I exported this to Rhino where it does flatten yet it still will not in Inv2013.

Any insight?

Thanks in advance...

Post to the Community

Have questions about Autodesk products? Ask the community.

Download & Installation
Subscription Management
Announcements
Do you have 60 seconds to spare? The Autodesk Community Team is revamping our site ranking system and we want your feedback! Please click here to launch the 5 question survey. As always your input is greatly appreciated.