I don't think having the cable constrainted to a 2d sketch would
be acceptable, it needs to flow in 3 dimensions. I might just end
up having to tweak the end positions and keep checking the length
until it falls within a certain tolerance zone.
Bob S.
"Donovan Cox" wrote in message news:401e7501$1_1@newsprd01...
> Here's a thought, for the path of the cable, create a construction line with
> a fixed center point and a set linear dimension. Have the ends of the line
> constrained to the ends of your path, so as one end of your path moves down,
> the construction line acts like a lever and causes the other end to move up.
> Of course this requires the path of the cable to be on a 2d sketch, and for
> the radius that runs over the pulley to be fixed, along with the center of
> that radius to be dimensioned. I'll try to get around to doing something
> that illustrates this later today.
>
> "Quinn Zander" wrote in message
> news:401a9829_1@newsprd01...
> > ....and having the ability to dim curve length in an IDW and NOT in a
> > IPT sketch just makes me crazy.
> >
> > I'm sure this lack of continuity between the drawing/modelling modules
> > is just a sick twisted joke of some disallusioned developer. (the same
> > guy that decided that projection should behave differently between IPT
> > and IDW sketches)
> >
> > QBZ
> >
> >
> > "Dave Hoder"
> > wrote in message news:401a9681
> > $1_3@newsprd01...
> >
> > > Dimension Curve Length was on my wish list. We run into this alot
> > where flat
> > > stock must follow a curved path but hold its length due to available
> > > lengths.
> >
> >
>
>