Inventor Fusion

Reply
*Neil Munro
Message 1 of 7 (339 Views)

Split Issue

339 Views, 6 Replies
06-30-2009 03:03 PM
The attached video shows an issue with push/pull of split faces. A closed
split refuses to be adjusted with push/pull or move, the entire face is
affected. Is there a trick I'm missing?

Love the gesture based commands!

http://screencast.com/t/1g6xYzpg
Employee
jeff.strater
Posts: 166
Registered: ‎08-28-2006
Message 2 of 7 (339 Views)

Re: Split Issue

06-30-2009 03:16 PM in reply to: *Neil Munro
Yes, you are correct. This is a limitation of the current push/pull functionality. It is a high priority issue for us to fix.

Just as additional information, you can use Extrude or Revolve, however, to convert a split planar face into 3D geometry (unfortunately, it won't work in this particular case).

Jeff Strater (Fusion development)
Contributor
Mattaxe
Posts: 22
Registered: ‎07-22-2009
Message 3 of 7 (339 Views)

Re: Split Issue

07-24-2009 03:01 AM in reply to: *Neil Munro
Extrude works well....How does it differ from push/pull?
Employee
jeff.strater
Posts: 166
Registered: ‎08-28-2006
Message 4 of 7 (339 Views)

Re: Split Issue

07-24-2009 08:18 AM in reply to: *Neil Munro
Good question. The main difference between Push/Pull (or Offset) and Extrude is in the handling of non-planar geometry. Extrude won't work at all on a cylindrical or spline face which has been split, while (if it worked at all), Offset would allow you to select a split portion of, say, a cylinder, and offset it, resulting in the introduction of side faces, and an offset of the split portion of the cylinder (that is, with a larger radius). See attached picture
Contributor
Mattaxe
Posts: 22
Registered: ‎07-22-2009
Message 5 of 7 (339 Views)

Re: Split Issue

07-24-2009 10:28 PM in reply to: *Neil Munro
AAAAhhhh.... Thanks, will we be able to specify that the "side faces" of offset are geometrically normal to the surface from which they extend?
Employee
jeff.strater
Posts: 166
Registered: ‎08-28-2006
Message 6 of 7 (339 Views)

Re: Split Issue

07-25-2009 11:31 AM in reply to: *Neil Munro
We haven't yet gotten to that level of detail in our plans, to be honest. But, this is very valuable feedback - I assume that you would like the ability to control the shape of the side faces? Normal to surface is one option - are there other options that you would also find useful?

Thanks,

Jeff Strater (Fusion development team)
Contributor
Mattaxe
Posts: 22
Registered: ‎07-22-2009
Message 7 of 7 (339 Views)

Re: Split Issue

07-25-2009 08:30 PM in reply to: *Neil Munro
To give that option a bit more depth, we might specify the angle of the side wall relitively to the surface (point) from which it extends. This may get complex and create conflict as surfaces extend outwards so a warning dialouge may be needed to inform user, or it may only allow the user to offset by a limited amount.

Square or triangular (or other) offset may allow to set a different angle for each side face.

Offset might also include a twist option or an arc option.

or maybe an "offset too" option.
Post to the Community

Have questions about Autodesk products? Ask the community.

New Post
Announcements
Do you have 60 seconds to spare? The Autodesk Community Team is revamping our site ranking system and we want your feedback! Please click here to launch the 5 question survey. As always your input is greatly appreciated.