How do i get the dashed line to go away for a house or tree area?
Can I define a building type, like a skyscraper or office building? I only see residential and neighborhood in the styles palette.
Can I overlay two images and have one be on top and 50% transparent?
I'm using 2013 version.
Solved! Go to Solution.
wow, no responses from Autodesk on simple issues for an emerging product.
Not sure if they realize our successes are free advertising, but may not matter now that AIM is shoved into the 2013 suites.
The dashed green lines are visible when you're in edit mode. To turn them off, simply click on the arrow button which will put you in select mode. Also, today we don't have different classifications for buildings. So, while, yes, you can create something that looks like a skyscraper, it is really just a tall structure in AIM. Finally, yes, you can apply imagery as covereages which can be overlaid.
I hope this helps.
awesome, just click out of edit mode...
imagery as coverage? Can you be specific since I thought that word referred to shapefiles and old ESRI format.
Is it just an image with world file brought in as something besides a raster?
Is there any transparency control over coverages?
AIM supports at lot of "referenced" image formats, esp. the most often used GeoTIFF format; for a list of supported formats have a look here: http://www.gdal.org/formats_list.html.
Right now, we support transparency encoded by the image (e.g. RGB + Alpha); an additional "global" transparency value per image (in order to also make the opaque pixels transparent) is not supported (yet).
And you can define the "stacking" order of overlapping (semi-transparent) textures with the help of the "Manage Surface Layers" dialog from the "home" ribbon.
Coverages are "just" polygonal features which can be draped onto the terrain surface; they do not refer to ESRI's Shapefiles, although you can import such polygons from Shapefiles for sure and a lot other vector data formats.
You can stylize the resulting coverage polygons by assign AIM "Materials" (either simple (semi-transparent) colors or (semi-transparent) textures) to them; you can also assign self-defined "coverage styles" to them, which allow additional "category => material" mappings and to specify some outlining. If several coverage polygons overlap the corresponding transparency contained in the material definition is also taken into account.
So the coverage method is only for shapes, I thought you were saying it applied to images too.
I guess you could make a material out of your aerial image, but lining things up would be a pain, if possible at all.
So for images, you are saying to bring them in as rasters, and control how you see one image under the other via alpha, which is hardcoded in the image, and I think only certain formats like png support that. Does jpg support it?
If that is true, I should be able to pull in an overall image, then separate smaller ones that just cover certain areas.
If I set the order for smaller ones on top, they should block the overall image and would appear spliced in, to the user.
Anyone tried that as I did the other day and it did not seem to work.