Discussion Groups
New Idea
57 Kudos
pawelpiechnik

Young Modulus Reduction

Status: New Idea
by Employee on ‎11-15-2012 02:22 PM

For some calculations sometimes we need to take into account different Young modulus depending of the nature of load cases. This is expected for a single model, to avoid duplication of model data. We see such requirements in Eurocode and also AISC codes.

11 Kudos
t.sautier

Legend Colour

Status: New Idea
by Valued Mentor on ‎01-09-2014 01:52 AM

Allows to change colour in the legend when using this for example for section type etc .... sometimes when using a lot of different types, it pretty hard to see the difference even if painting is a hobby!

53 Kudos
jk

Brick Wall generator

Status: New Idea
by jk on ‎11-16-2012 03:47 AM

Function wich automaticly made brick wall ( plate with material, stiffness etc) from  contour

41 Kudos
Tuctas

Composite members steel and concrete-EC4

Status: New Idea
by Distinguished Contributor Tuctas on ‎02-10-2013 11:20 PM

  It is strongly needed to have a module for design of composite steel and concrete members according to EC4.

44 Kudos
Tuctas

Steel connections

Status: New Idea
by Distinguished Contributor Tuctas on ‎12-28-2012 12:42 PM

Splice connection between steel members. Also it would be very
useful the designer to have the information of the weight of the steel
connection.

1 Kudo
StefanoPasquini6790

AUTO OPTIMIZATION AS SAP

Status: New Idea
by Mentor on ‎07-04-2014 04:57 AM
Hi everyone,<br><br>It could be absolutely powerful if will be added the option to optimize each bar in the code check, as happened in SAP, in this way the user can define a family of cross section and each bar can be searched in this family. After the first optimization run it is possible to group some member into a "SAME-CROSS-SECTION" family and go on with the optimization and the checking of all the bars.<br><br>Greerings
2 Kudos
jokiller70

Colormark separate structures

Status: New Idea
by Active Contributor jokiller70 on ‎06-04-2014 01:10 AM

It would be nice if the separate structures in separate structures error would be marked with diferent colors!

9 Kudos
tony.ridley

change moment of inertia for any section

Status: New Idea
by Valued Mentor on ‎01-13-2014 07:18 PM

similar to how you can change moment of inertia for a concrete beam, extend this functinality to ANY section type. 

35 Kudos
igos

General Perfomance

Status: New Idea
by Active Contributor igos on ‎02-23-2013 10:27 AM

Working on my last project (it's an concrete structure, about 150 000 nodes and 170 000 FE-s) I was extremely annoyed by Robot Str 2013 general performance. For example, changing an load value is operation with time consumption not less that half of minute  on quite modern hardware (core i7 etc.). Changing values in tables is not much quicker...

 

I understand that you can recommend to use diaphagms instead shell etc, but in general - performance of Robot is not the best one, I can say the worst one. Now it is 2013 year and yes, sometimes we have to analyse and calculate models with more than 3 bars...

 

Here I do not speak of calculating time, meshing time - it's only problem of general performance, for example, changing load values in large scale models. So, my Idea is to optimize code (I'm fully understand that it can take a lot of time) to make Robot works much quicker. 

38 Kudos

Update and keep panel/cladding elements connected when nodal coordinates are modified

30 Kudos
espen.ruud

Improved table editing in Robot

Status: New Idea
by espen.ruud on ‎02-11-2013 05:37 AM

Problem: The table editing tools in Robot are slow and have poor functionality. Usually it is better to copy the table to Excel and edit it there, but this can cause trouble (example: planar loads on contour becoming planar loads in my experience). Besides, for small changes this should not be neccessary.

 

Solution: Advanced table editing module or two way link to excel for all tables. Allows quick editing of tables, making changes to the model only when the user clicks apply.

3 Kudos

Hi Autodesk,

 

It would be very useful, large model, to introduce in the check table of the steel members the option to display, during the checking progress, the following data:

 

1) The total number steel bars to check;


2) Total number of steel bars verified;


3) Total number of steel bars unverified.

 

This can be done differently for ULS and for SLS.

 

This option can help the user to manage the code checking phase.

30 Kudos
tony.ridley

Revit link - results

Status: New Idea
by Valued Mentor on ‎01-07-2013 04:53 AM

1. Send colour maps for panels to Revit 

2. Send internal forces for beams or nodes to revit for documentation

 

27 Kudos

When running non-linear analysis, different combinations should be computed simultaneously in separate threads. This would make such calculation almost an order of magnitude faster.

25 Kudos
Tuctas

Node selection

Status: New Idea
by Distinguished Contributor Tuctas ‎02-16-2013 10:51 AM - edited ‎02-16-2013 10:53 AM

  When we select a node by indicating its number, it is marked with a green color spot in the structure but if the structure is a little more than simlpe it's difficult for the user to see where it is... It should be marked by a different (more clear) way, for instance the node could be enclosed in a small circle in order to be visible. 

28 Kudos
Tuctas

Push over

Status: New Idea
by Distinguished Contributor Tuctas on ‎12-29-2012 10:35 AM

  A general update in push over analysis should take place.

  There are several issues that must be resolved in order this type of analysis to be completed in Robot. Some of these are already posted, for instance the following links:

 

http://forums.autodesk.com/t5/Autodesk-Robot-Structural/Capacity-curve/td-p/3651586

 

http://forums.autodesk.com/t5/Autodesk-Robot-Structural/Frustrating-plastic-hinges/m-p/3649112/highl...

 

..and many others like the ability to set a starting case (usually containing dead and live loads) before the push over analysis  e.t.c (I think that some of them are already posted as SR in Subscription Center).

 

 

2 Kudos
aruser

GROUP defining OBJECT PROPERTIES

Status: New Idea
by Valued Contributor aruser on ‎05-08-2014 03:21 AM

Currently you can add bars to a group which is very useful to select those bars after. But if you want to change some properties such us the material, the section, the release or whatever, you have to do it one by one. I mean, select the bars, then change the section, after change the material, after change the relase...

 

In my opinion, would be very useful the posibility of make a kind of "MASTER GROUP" which not only save the selection of the bars but also all kind of properties so, changing the property in the group you change it authomatically for all the bars belonging to that group.

That would be much faster to change and review.

 

Likewise for nodes.

28 Kudos

It would be very useful to implement RC design of typical pile caps and circular spread footings (including footings with variable thickness).

Announcements
IdeaStation Guidelines
Review guidelines and best practices
before posting a new idea.