ASMI Improvement Request.
Although displayed on Version before, when the node number was registered into the
displacement magnitude query, displacement magnitude was displayed on the direction of
the picture as a history, but it is no longer displayed as after ASMI2014.
If a history is displayed on a picture when creating data etc., it is convenient,
but isn't it improvable like former Version?
Examination needs your help well.
** WARNING 701360 ** Beam element 102175 has a very bad length/diameter ratio
warning is useless, as far as i know, for hot and cold runner elements. please exclude them from the warning.
I would like to be able to combine 3D part elements with Midplane Part Surface elements.
(Think of film gates or living hinges, where the midplane elements are handy when you want to change the wall thickness quickly AND where you do not want to end up with very flat 3D tetras.)
(Note that combination of Dual Domain and Midplane is already possible!)
Sometimes the mesh on the cad body fails due to some error on the cad face number xxxx.
You have no way to quickly understand which is the face and try to fix it in the cad or Cad Doctor.
It could be useful to use the Query Entities on the cad faces.
1. if you point on a element, the corresponding layer could light up
2. the other way round, if you point on a layer, the corrensponding elements could light up
3. in the layers window there could be a additional column for the colour per elementtype
a switch would be nice. if its turned on, all valve gates close automatically at start foaming, because you dont know the time when foaming actually starts when defining a % value.
The possibility to create a box in graphic area to make a annotation on result.
When you did a note in results, some times is difficult to describe the exactly point where will occur something wrong.
You create a annotation tool, like a box that you can put a mensagem and link to a Node or local in the model. And this box follow the model in graphic Area.
I think this will be good in two situation, first in ASMI or ASMI to create a results or MFR file and when will revise the result in Communicator.
Feature line select, the possibility to select an edge or feature line in mesh for path plot or align nodes.
Currently, when you will make a path plot, you need select node by node to represent a edge. When you have a several study with differents meshes, this will take a long time.
A tool for select a feature line by nodes in order. Like you have in some Pre-processor tools (e.g. ANSA)
I want a new result what called "Particle Trace" in CFD programs.
The function is, some chosen point in the part displays the stream line which shows the way
plastics go and where it stops.
It will be usefull to predict silver defects and moving airtraps.
In today's version I am using the "Flow Rate" arrows. But it is so difficult to interprete the
contnuity of the flow.
I would like to have the Mesh Diagnostics for "Mold Surface temperature" in Part element properties.
For considering the mold temperature variation without cooling anaysis, you will set several temperature
across the part.
But if you want to checkout where you have set and what value you have set,
what you can do is to display each property dialog again, or run the analysis and see temperature results.
both of them takes time.
So I want this function.
Synergy have the simular function for DD"Thickness" so I sure you can do it.
Adding to that forget about displaying Mold Surface Temperature "profiles" .At least If you can see the
first value in the profile, I can check where I have set or not.
At any time you can press F1 or click the question mark icon and get help.
I still recommend, moldflow should re-introduce the same option, many times it was useful.
Often, after starting a typical Cool(FEM)+Fill+Pack+Warp sequence, and while still at an early stage (i.e. Cool(FEM) running), one may change his/her mind on some options re further-on behavior; for example demand Warp to isolate the components. But when you change ANYTHING in Process Settings - regarless on whether it would really affect the current analysis state - we're presented with this familiar "Create copy", "Delete Results", or "Cancel" warning window. Less expereinced useers get frightened off by the necessity of running the sequence from scratch, so they cancel and do not introduse the desired changes...
It would be nice if the program "considered" the situation first, and only display the warning window if the user-introduced changes would invalidate the already produced/being produced results, or require the running analysis to alter the way it's executing. We the more experienced users know that if none of the above would happen, pressing "Delete" will actuallyNOT stop the sequence while introducing our changes to the way the consecutive analyses should execute.
Do you consider to introduce a more intelligent, context-sensitive use of the "Create copy", "Delete Results", or "Cancel" dialog window?