Discussion Groups
New Idea
0 Kudos
serori2k

ASMI Improvement of Displacement query

Status: New Idea
by serori2k on ‎07-01-2014 06:50 PM

ASMI Improvement Request.

 

Although displayed on Version before, when the node number was registered into the
displacement magnitude query, displacement magnitude was displayed on the direction of
the picture as a history, but it is no longer displayed as after ASMI2014.
If a history is displayed on a picture when creating data etc., it is convenient,
 but isn't it improvable like former Version?
Examination needs your help well.

0 Kudos

the

** WARNING 701360 ** Beam element  102175 has a very bad length/diameter ratio

 

 

warning is useless, as far as i know, for hot and cold runner elements. please exclude them from the warning.

 

 

1 Kudo
emka70

Combining 3D Part elements with Midplane Part Surface elements

Status: New Idea
by emka70 ‎06-30-2014 04:24 AM - edited ‎06-30-2014 04:25 AM

I would like to be able to combine 3D part elements with Midplane Part Surface elements.

(Think of film gates or living hinges, where the midplane elements are handy when you want to change the wall thickness quickly AND where you do not want to end up with very flat 3D tetras.)

 

(Note that combination of Dual Domain and Midplane is already possible!)

 

BRM

 

0 Kudos
Segato2011

Query Entities on the cad faces

Status: New Idea
by Segato2011 on ‎06-30-2014 03:40 AM

Sometimes the mesh on the cad body fails due to some error on the cad face number xxxx.

 

You have no way to quickly understand which is the face and try to fix it in the cad or Cad Doctor.

 

It could be useful to use the Query Entities on the cad faces.

0 Kudos

Use the command select by layer just right clicking on the layer in the layers panel

0 Kudos
dinesh27mec

Export options to MFR

Status: New Idea
by Active Contributor dinesh27mec on ‎06-28-2014 02:26 AM

Hi,

 

You have options called "unmark all for export", similarly there should be something for marking too. This will be helpful while publishing the resuts in MFR format

1 Kudo
timotheusruf

layer functionalities

Status: Under Review
by timotheusruf on ‎06-25-2014 07:13 AM

1. if you point on a element, the corresponding layer could light up


2. the other way round, if you point on a layer, the corrensponding elements could light up

 

3. in the layers window there could be a additional column for the colour per elementtype

Status: Under Review
We are working on (1) and (2) and have prototypes. Please join our Beta program (beta.autodesk.com; User Research) to have an early look and provide feedback.
0 Kudos
timotheusruf

mycell - close valve gates at start foaming automatically

Status: New Idea
by timotheusruf ‎06-25-2014 02:39 AM - edited ‎06-25-2014 03:02 AM

a switch would be nice. if its turned on, all valve gates close automatically at start foaming, because you dont know the time when foaming actually starts when defining a % value.

2 Kudos
emka70

Save View per project, not per study (Moldflow)

Status: New Idea
by emka70 on ‎06-23-2014 01:45 PM

I would like to save view project based, not study based

Now I often have to re-save the view for multiple studies

BR Mark

 

4 Kudos
fabio.caires

Valve gates in ASMA

Status: New Idea
by fabio.caires on ‎06-20-2014 08:17 PM

My sugestion is to create a possibility to simulate valve gates for a sequencial injection in ASMA Ultimate.

6 Kudos
renan.melhado

Insert Annotation in MFR file

Status: New Idea
by renan.melhado on ‎06-20-2014 09:27 AM

Summary
The possibility to create a box in graphic area to make a annotation on result.
Problem
When you did a note in results, some times is difficult to describe the exactly point where will occur something wrong.
Solution Proposed

You create a annotation tool, like a box that you can put a mensagem and link to a Node or local in the model. And this box follow the model in graphic Area.
I think this will be good in two situation, first in ASMI or ASMI to create a results or MFR file and when will revise the result in Communicator.

 

 

3 Kudos
renan.melhado

option to select a Feature line

Status: New Idea
by renan.melhado on ‎06-20-2014 09:18 AM

Summary

 

Feature line select, the possibility to select an edge or feature line in mesh for path plot or align nodes.

 

Problem

 

Currently, when you will make a path plot, you need select node by node to represent a edge. When you have a several study with differents meshes, this will take a long time.

 

Solution Proposed

 

A tool for select a feature line by nodes in order. Like you have in some Pre-processor tools (e.g. ANSA)

 

4 Kudos
xkoja.tomoyasu

Sink marks estimate results

Status: New Idea
by xkoja.tomoyasu on ‎06-19-2014 12:33 AM

Our customer request you to display the Sink marks estimate results in the thick portion other than the boss geometry and a rib geometry.
Because he want to see the shrinkage of the thick portion.

4 Kudos
isidmf99

Particle trace for Moldflow results

Status: New Idea
by isidmf99 on ‎06-06-2014 12:27 AM

I want a new result what called "Particle Trace" in CFD programs.

 

The function is, some chosen point in the part displays the stream line which shows the way

 plastics go and where it stops. 

It will be usefull to predict silver defects and moving airtraps.

 

In today's version I am using the "Flow Rate" arrows. But it is so difficult to interprete the

contnuity of the flow.

 

Thank you.     

0 Kudos
isidmf99

Diagnostics for Mold Temperature Settings

Status: New Idea
by isidmf99 on ‎06-06-2014 12:09 AM

I would like to have the Mesh Diagnostics for "Mold Surface temperature" in Part element properties.

 

For considering the mold temperature variation without cooling anaysis, you will set several temperature

across the part.

But if you want to checkout where you have set and what value you have set,

what you can do is to display each property dialog again, or run the analysis and see temperature results.

both of them takes time.

 

So I want this function.

Synergy have the simular function for DD"Thickness" so I sure you can do it.

 

Adding to that forget about displaying Mold Surface Temperature "profiles" .At least If you can see the

first value in the profile,  I can check where I have set or not.

 

Thank you.

 

 

 

  

0 Kudos
moldmastersjkoo

Apply extra refinedment near gate

Status: New Idea
by moldmastersjkoo on ‎05-30-2014 10:27 AM

Mesh option "Apply extra refiment near gate" is not enoght mesh area size for a bigger gate over 5mm.

I would suggest add a gate size option to mesh suit for a size of the gate.

6 Kudos
phammer

cutting plane should be same in locked studies

Status: New Idea
by Contributor phammer on ‎05-27-2014 02:43 AM

HI

 

it would be good for analysis of several studies, if the studies are locked also the cutting plane would be the same in every study. 

would be helpfull.

 

Philipp

3 Kudos
Properties of elements or beam should have 'layer information' ======================================================== It means it will be easy to find a location of layer, for which they belong to
1 Kudo

At any time you can press F1 or click the question mark icon and get help.

=============================================================

 

I still recommend, moldflow should re-introduce the same option, many times it was useful.

2 Kudos

Often, after starting a typical Cool(FEM)+Fill+Pack+Warp sequence, and while still at an early stage (i.e. Cool(FEM) running), one may change his/her mind on some options re further-on behavior; for example demand Warp to isolate the components. But when you change ANYTHING in Process Settings - regarless on whether it would really affect the current analysis state - we're presented with this familiar "Create copy", "Delete Results", or "Cancel" warning window. Less expereinced useers get frightened off by the necessity of running the sequence from scratch, so they cancel and do not introduse the desired changes...

 

It would be nice if the program "considered" the situation first, and only display the warning window if the user-introduced changes would invalidate the already produced/being produced results, or require the running analysis to alter the way it's executing. We the more experienced users know that if none of the above would happen, pressing "Delete" will actuallyNOT stop the sequence while introducing our changes to the way the consecutive analyses should execute.

 

Do you consider to introduce a more intelligent, context-sensitive use of the "Create copy", "Delete Results", or "Cancel" dialog window?

 

Thanks

 

Piotr

Announcements
IdeaStation Guidelines
Review guidelines and best practices
before posting a new idea.