New Idea
8 Kudos

Gentlemen,

 

Issue:

 

Read only files or "non-checked out" files, continue to be prompted for saving inside of an Inventor assembly model. Why is this happening? I know the little messages (see Vault messages below) are supposed to let you know the file is not being saved back to Vault, but something is happening. Somehow the files become edited out of turn, which means they're being saved locally somehow. Then the Vault file and the workspace file are out of sync.

 

Solution:

 

Can we just remove the Vaulted "read only" files from the assembly save dialog all together?

Is it possible to not change the local file in the certain way that makes Vault see it out of sync?

 

I have Vaulted released files that are part of assemblies that are checked out for editing and somehow the parts of the assembly that are not checked out seem to always become out of sync.

 

Also, some of these parts are iParts.

 

Please give this post Kudos if you have the "read only" file out of sync with Vault issue.

Autodesk: Please consider my request. Thanks.

 

Vault Messages:

 

"Write enable (not checked out from Vault)"

 "'XXXXXX.iam' is currently locked. Do you want to continue editing anyway?  Your changes will not get saved to the Vault."

 

11 Kudos

We have a series of part numbering schemes created over the last couple years.

When viewing the number schemes in the Creation Tool, they are listed in alphabetical order.

However, when actually using the number schemes to create new part numbers, they are listed in order of creation. (See snapshot.)

It would be good to see this list in alphabetical (alphanumeric) order.

 

Note: This same behavior is seen with the ECO routing list.

 

Item Number Scheme.gif

7 Kudos

I've known this issue has existed from about day one in Productstream and now Vault Pro, but
it's time that this security issue is fixed. I feel its a major defect, but they tell me it's "AS DESIGNED".

 

If you are using items, this has the potential to be costly to your organization. It allows users to print an older version of a file which has been revised and it still shows the water mark of "RELEASED". All without any kind of warning.

 

We are dealing with items and when an item has several revisions and you toggle back thru the revisions, the drawings
linked to that revision still have a water mark of released, even though the drawing is an old - revised drawing.

 

The attached video illustrates this disaster waiting to happen.

 

http://screencast.com/t/h9LJs0mw

 

There has to be a way to prevent the printing of older drawings with "RELEASED" on them. The water mark should say "VOIDED Drawing" or the like when a user toggles the revision level back. Any guidance here on how to
fix this issue?

 

Steve Hilvers

4 Kudos
gabriele.bonacini

Link numbering schene to categories

Status: New Idea
by gabriele.bonacini on ‎05-12-2014 06:00 AM

At the moment we can link at the categories only lifecicles, properties and revision scheme.

I think it may be usefull to select also the numbering scheme.

 

thanks

2 Kudos

The Vault search text box displays "Search Projects" or "Search Vault Explorer ($)" - often when clicking in the search text box the default text is not cleared and what ever is typed is added to the default text.  The result is that the search is not done correctly.

 

This behaviour is shown in the attached screen shot.

 

According to Autodesk Customer Support this behaviour has existed for several releases of the Vault.

 

I would like the search box default text to clear when clicking in the box to enter data.

2 Kudos
hans_hydrac

Vault Systempropertie file size

Status: New Idea
by hans_hydrac on ‎05-16-2014 12:01 AM

Make the Propertie File Size more readable, like Windows Explorer

 

 

Vault_Filegröße1.JPG

 

Vault_Filegröße2.JPG

3 Kudos

Vault Feature Request: When you obsolete an item it should obsolete all previous revisions, released or not.

 

Obsolete Items are still viewable in Web Client because some previous revisions are released

 

Ref: previous Autodesk case 09411810 and new Autodesk case 09515277

 

Also see attached Word doc with relevant context as "Obsolete Item scenario - public.doc"

 

The customer has the advised workflow and has asked for this feature request case be opened with Autodesk to obsolete all previous revisions, released or not.

 

The reasoning is so that Web Client users cannot access parts in error that are no longer in production.

 

The business case for this company involves 35 seats of Vault Pro 2014 and several dozen more Vault Web Client users at multiple sites routinely relying upon the accuracy of parts that are accessible as 'in production'.

 

They do not want obsolete parts being requisitioned or ordered as parts of extensive bills of material, for example.

 

They understand that this feature request will likely not be made available in Vault 2014. They have the workflow workaround in place as an alternative as detailed in the attached Obsolete Item scenario - public.doc

8 Kudos

As a company we want to have "Auto-Select First Duplicate" item checked as a default. Please make this a global Vault Item setting vs a client side setting. We have new users all the time and this setting seems to get overlooked a lot which in turn generates a bunch of random item numbers. It would be best to control it globally.

 

 

AutoSelect.jpg

Status: Implemented
Implemented in Vault Professional 2015
14 Kudos

I'm as Vault Administrator not happy to be the only person who can purge Items.

I don't see any danger to give such right to users with "Item Editor (level 2)" role.

Please do so.

Otherwise vault administrators all over the world would invent optimal method to purge all Items on a regular basis.

...draft Item revisions block draft file versions to be purged, right?

Status: Under Review
3 Kudos
Dan.M

copy paste properties between items

Status: Accepted
by *Expert Elite* on ‎03-06-2014 12:44 PM

Many times is much easier to copy paste content from one item to another in the properties.

Is it possible to do that? Today I can copy paste "title" or "decription" . 

This needs to be extended to properties also.

Thanks

Dan

Status: Accepted

You are not logged in.

Log into access your profile, ask and answer questions, share ideas and more. Haven't signed up yet? Register

Announcements
IdeaStation Guidelines
Review guidelines and best practices
before posting a new idea
Labels
Top Kudoed Authors
User Kudos Count
18
18
13
11
10